Talk:Laundry

From Pee Review

i mistakenly put the article laundry up on the village dump main forum page like the noob that I am, but i would just like any suggestions or edits as i have gotten 2 so far and they helped out a lot. I actually found the article on laundry, lost, abandoned, and only about 3 sentences long, so i decided to see if i could patch it up.

Not a bad start -- the caption on the pic is amusing, too. The article needs to focus on one element or another. I like the history section with famous leaders' attitudes toward laundry better than the top, so I'd suggest developing that. You can keep the sexuality stuff, but don't go too overboard on it. And you haven't, which distinguishes you from 99 percent of other noobs.  :) (P.S. Link the name of the article in your headline.)--Procopius 03:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay, i developed it more, i still need to make it through modern history, as I have a few more ideas for some jokes on american history, but i think this article is looking pretty good. I was wondering if my style of only slightly altering history is a good thing, as many articles on uncyclopedia seem to just be utter bullshit rather than partial bullshit. Ace143 00:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

• I'm partial to partial bullshiit, as this article demonstrates.--Procopius 12:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)