Talk:Homeopathy
By the way, I didn't make up that "Homœopathic Pharmacopœia" spelling. I got it here. Kudos to Uncyclopedia for supporting it. --Bbroadside 00:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
I don't know if this article will be funny to anyone not familiar with homeopathy. If not, squish it real gently and I promise not to cry. I really like the last sentence but I'm not sure if anyone else will. By all means advise me, especially on internal links and formatting (I'd like a Contents box, etc.) My main question is whether or not to add in external links to serious sites at various points in the article, to demonstrate that a lot of this is bonafide homeopathic doctrine (c.f. Scientology article). Also, how about my use of the first person? I like it (for this particular article), but I've seen it contraindicated in the Uncyclopedia help pages. Do movie titles belong in italics? Quotes? --Bbroadside 23:51, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Done a little bit of tidying up, along with adding an image (will try to find a few more for you). If you want to add some "useful links" to the bottom, it will look like a very decent first article. Nice work, and welcome to Uncyclopedia. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
- Thanks again. Did the "truth is funnier than this" box I lifted from the $cientology page not belong? I'll dig up some links. --Bbroadside 00:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- I was on an anonymous Sandbox vandalising spree and as I pulled out my spraycan I saw shreds of this article lying all over the place. I don't know who wrote it (B. Broadside? Uncle Mhaille? Uncle Mhaille's sock? Whoever!), but, at least, it rocks! -- Colonel Swordman, hiding anonymously behind transparent proxy server 202.6.138.43, 03:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- The article is the beastie of Mr Broadside, I just moved it to its space and did a bit of tidying up. Any kudos should be directed towards him. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Good Job[edit source]
This article could save the lives of people conserdering homeopathy.