Talk:File 8AO4F: The God Case
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wow this is an odd article. I'm not sure what to make of it. I kind of get the allusions, but still feel I'm missing the flucrum of what the joke moves on. It's surprisingly fine without pics. Maybe give me a rundown on what you are hoping to do with the article?
BTW very good work on the jfk audio...it's extremely hard to keep up a sense of intensity and 'real-time' in a recording like that, while also speaking the script correctly.--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 20:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
Humour: | 9 | Some parts were "meh", but most of the piece had me laughing pretty hard. Great casual style that contrasts the 'serious government document.' |
Concept: | 10 | I would've NEVER thought to do something like this! It's very original and I've never seen anything like it. You should do more of these style articles. Perhaps one depicting a strange apocolypse or natural disaster? Cloverfield spoof? |
Prose and formatting: | 9 | Seems casual as in a converational style. Hard to read at times though, but it isn't a huge deal. |
Images: | 0 | You didn't have any. I know that you must've felt that you could've added any or that they weren't necessary, but come on man! Here's an idea: Make a blurry image of 'GOD' with a giant red classified stamp over it so that nothing is visible. That would be quite humourous. |
Miscellaneous: | 9 | So creative, so interesting, and witty! This will get featured soon (you're good at making featured articles, aren't you?). |
Final Score: | 37 | Images aside, this is a great article! Just add some images...maybe a picture of Dr. Guatanamo or something. Every classified document has some blurry Polaroids attatched. |
Reviewer: | UserTalk |
Nominated for feature[edit source]
{{VFH}} I didn't want to clutter the actual article