Talk:Battle of Agincourt
This shows a lot of promise and a presumed familiarity with the subject as well. --Romartus 18:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I had a re-read of this article. You don't need to link a word that appears in the article all the time
like for example France . Just do it the first time that appears in an article and leave the rest
in plain text. Perhaps because I am a history bore/buff - I got all your references as well but perhaps some of
it could be put in the notes section (some of the pre-battle arguments of example) as I think they may
hold up the main part of the article as regards the battle. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Soggy..I added a few extras to the article and moved one line to the end as it appeared to be out of position. Feel free to revert. One thing I would suggest is that normally you only put in a link the first time you use the word (eg France). --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Soggy..I added a few extras to the article and moved one line to the end as it appeared to be out of position. Feel free to revert. One thing I would suggest is that normally you only put in a link the first time you use the word (eg France). --
I think we should take back the 'Operation Swift Resolution' joke (as a footnote or something on hundred-years war, since '1-year' didn't make me laugh. Also historical relevance. Myocardialinfarction 01:13, November 5, 2009 (UTC)