From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

From Pee Review[edit]

Humour: 4.5 The jokes are a bit too obvious and lack subtlety. This isn't a bad idea for an article, but it needs a better structure and buildup. Gradually reveal disturbing things about the narrator rather than blatently saying them. Also avoid cliches like emos, they kill humour like poison.
Concept: 7 Not a bad idea but it needs work.
Prose and formatting: 5 The sentence structure needs improvement.
Images: 7 The images are fine. The caption on the image representing hell was quite funny.
Miscellaneous: 6.5 Don't know what this is for.
Final Score: 30 Overall its not a bad idea it just needs a more subtle approach.
Reviewer: --Winstanley1 12:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)