HowTo talk:Play Conservatroll

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Post high scores and classic posts here! Warmonkey 03:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I almost want to feature this. Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer (missile ponies for everyone!) 01:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow! If you made it a featured article that would be awesome! Thankyou for the high praise. Warmonkey 12:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured? This article is too listy and is total pants/bollocks/republicancruft. --Slavemaster2 18:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I thought this was the discussion page for the Conservapedia article, which really needs a rewrite. This page is good. --Slavemaster2 19:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

What the heck is a "republicancruft" and where can I buy one? 217.44.189.126 01:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to change this page to be HowTo: play conservatroll, but I dont know how to do that. If anyone knows and would be willing to do that, I would really appreciate it! Just leave a message on my profile if you do so I know to go and see it. Thankyou. Warmonkey 00:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Use the Move Page function on the top of the page--Slavemaster2 19:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


Sooo...[edit source]

Anyone up for a game? http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:sleepygamer sleepygamer Phencyclidine TALK STUFF 19:21, Mar 3

Team Rationalwiki be kickin' yo' ass, but I 'd be up for it. --Educated wisest cubic - Treason

Anyone want a game?[edit source]

This just sounds so fun that I've got to try it out. I'll make it that my recent edit of Earth[[1]] aiming for 107 points per ten minutes doesn't count though. It'll be a test edit although I think would have 107 already.

I once scored the fucktard bonus! Look up the page about soccer on conservapedia and look for warmonkeys edits. My edit was removed them some silly bugger put it back on! Woohoo! 500 points!Warmonkey 13:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC) http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Soccer&oldid=368303 Check out the fact at the end about people incorrectly calling it football. If you check the history, it was remvoed and then replaced! 500 in the bank from the fucktard. I thankyou very much! Warmonkey 15:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

That one guy Help Jazz seems to have it in for you. How come you don't manage to get blocked?I got blocked on my first try: Your user name or IP address has been blocked.

The block was made by TerryH. The reason given is Vandalism--perhaps more subtle than most, but vandalism nonetheless..

He's pretty smart for a conservapedian. Munci 11:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Well of course you get blocked for taking the piss, that is the risk all heroic conservatroll players must run. Sometimes you get away with it, sometimes your account gets closed, sometimes they block you forever. It's not how long you last thogh, it's how much you score in the mean time that counts! Munci, I think the phrase "smart for a conservapedian" is equivilant to saying "clean for a tramp" or "friendly for a nazi". Not very meaningful! Anyone who would waste their life not just edditing conservapedia properly but actually becomming a moderater for the most laughable wiki ever made cant be that smart! You will find that on conservapedia, once one of the all powerful mods picks up that you are messing around they will go through and remove all your posts regardless of content. Thats why, if you want to score big, you have carefully balance between piss taking and giving yourself away. And that is what makes conservatroll the greatest game in the world! Warmonkey 11:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Ooh, I am therefore I did not know good[edit source]

if I truly want to reveal perhaps [ www.conservapedia.com/User:MathMan this ] is similar to some person to any person to realize and to destroy it, but I have the indeed best whereabouts to kick the buttocks in the honour ratio to approach the TEH CONCLUSION in the silence. --212.149.217.206 17:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea what any of that meant. But if it was a post in a game of conservatroll, it would not score any points, since it is not right wing, left wing, full of swearing or anything else that might score something. You score nothing for gibberish. Saying something that is patantly false scores points, but a nonsense statement is niether true nor false, as it means nothing. Warmonkey 17:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

No! I am unable to continue to live again! Why, OH why! ? ! But I meant you looked page www.conservapedia.com/User:MathMan, they have threatened my it by the prohibition rule but this are even silent standind. For huger justice! --212.149.217.84 19:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Again, no points. Warmonkey 00:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Ol' Dirty Bastard[edit source]

This rule was amusing but I removed it for two reasons-

1) I dont want the rules to start turning into a name dropping of celebrities and pop culture referances. If it starts to go down this road we will got an oscar wilde bonus, a chuck norris bonus, a mr T's pity bonus etc.

2) I dont want every post in every game of conservatroll to be about the same thing. If one particular phrase scores the most points, everyone will post with this phrase in every single game. This would lead to very boring, uninspired play. Note that the insane finland duck is a particular topic AND a particular page, so has very very limited applications. The Ol's Dirty Bastard rule could be used everytime I want to make an offensive, high risk post. Warmonkey 17:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


Question about British Spelling rules[edit source]

OK, say you edit Conservapedia with inaccurate information using only British spellings. Then somebody else edits the British spellings to American ones, but leaves the inaccurate info. Am I correct in assuming that you would keep British Spelling points already earned, but not gain that bonus any further (as well as getting a cheap 'n' easy Fucktard bonus)? 141.224.233.111 03:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

A great question and your interpretation is entirely correct. If your post is changed to no longer give the bonus (though you would keep all the bonus points you had scored up to that time. In Conservatroll points are awarded, not taken away), but you would still score the regular points (plus the fucktard bonus obviously). This applies to all bonus's in the same way. Though, if the person corrected your false information and left the British spellings, you would stop scoring since you cant score a bonus without a main scoring method. Warmonkey 16:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Rules update[edit source]

Thankyou to Don José for closing a loop hole in the rules. Well spotted! All players should now note that you cant get a Fucktard Bonus with Additional Right wing biase unless you also score from another non-bonus source as well. Check the rules for a rull explanation and examples.Warmonkey 15:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

A hole in the rules that I have noticed is the 2 hour limit. It completely invalidates the score given in the section "Epicest Game" as that went on for considerably longer than 2 hours.

Writing Assignment[edit source]

Asking Ed Poor about writing assignments and getting a writing assignment from him or asking how much he will pay for it to be written should score some points. What do you think?--Killerjoy 16:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC) Interesting concept, but it will need careful consideration. Remember that the point of Conservatroll is to make a mess of Conservapedia for as long as you can before getting stopped. Getting an assignment or engaging in discussion does not really harm Conservatroll and you could do those things while making legitimate posts. It would have to involve you getting an assignment to write something patently false, insane or liberal, which seems very unlikely. So I am inclined to say no but I am not closing the door on the idea. Thanks for your input though, it is nice to see so many enthusiastic conservatroll players comming forward.Warmonkey 00:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Good job[edit source]

Nice article. --EvilPerlScript 15:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Should there be a rule # 1: You don't talk about conservatroll?[edit source]

The reason for it should be obvious: Whatever is left in conservapedia when all players have been banned, should stay there as long as possible. One complete nonsense edit of mine has soon been on CP for a full year after all us players were banned so I have an epic score and whilst I'm sooooooooooo eager to let others than my fellow players know what it is since it's completely on par with "George Bush is a Viking dinosaur from outer space, made of cheese.", I know better than to post it here (greetings to all CP admins reading this!). The page has even been edited afterwards by "serious" users there without them noticing it and it's no small part of the page :)

How to create an account on conservapedia in order to play[edit source]

Been hunting around, can't work out how, it's almost as if they don't want people editing their articles... I would be grateful if someone could edit this with instructions.

It's on their main page, you have to email their dictator who then has your email code, etc. The site is heavy republican and was created by the son of a major old conservodumb, so they seem to be going more political now and protecting themselves from trolls. Aleister 17:17 13 12

Still no reply... Maybe because I used the name "Dr. Aladino Ibarra" in the email...

You are welcome to come and play here, Doctor. Much more fun than conservapedia anyway. They are probably cracking down on their userbase, limiting it to true-believers and facists. Aleister 11:14 Solstice MMX

You like it! You really like it![edit source]

I am so proud that this page has proved popular. Every time I go on conservapedia and see the edits to the Finland page...I feel a swell of pride in my heart/pants!

Is this enough ?[edit source]

Image:Duckduckduckandmoreduck.jpg

Yes, I know, it's not enough. But it's my first try. Next time, I'll put some liberal stuff, I promise. Rooomu23 (talk) 16:00, May 7, 2012 (UTC)