HowTo talk:Live in an RPG
From Pee Review[edit source]
FoxyBabe's last work, based on an entry at her myspace blog. It got positive reviews there, but people around there know she is Brazilian, and by so, not a native English speaker. Be kind to the lady and try to review the main concept, overlooking and, if possible, helping her with language flaws. I am a bad editor myself, everything I touch ends up as a NeedABrain's trademark text. :p -- herr doktor needsAgear 
[scream!] 22:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yup, I first wrote this at my personal blog, in my orginal language, then translated it (the best way I could, please no altavista jokes) and put on my myspace blog. People there seem to like it. Maybe it is too "nerdy"?--DAME :: FoxyBabe :: TALK 18:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- I thought it was hilarious myself. In fact, it kind of inspired me to do one based on fighting games. ;) --Hanyouman 17:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 8 | Good switching between sarcasm and absurdism, maybe too tame in some places. |
| Concept: | 7 | Obviously based on the Grand List of Console RPG Clichés(maybe a bit too obvious?), but that doesn't necessarily make it worse. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | Well formatted, well written. Even if English isn't your native language, it never showed. |
| Images: | 9 | Neat and nice, and quite a lot of 'em. The dancing mushroom was a bit ugly. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9 | Another minor point, maybe the article should be written a bit more in howTo-style: making the individual steps a bit more centred around single themes. |
| Final Score: | 43 | Well done, a good, coherent article with everything in place. |
| Reviewer: | --TheTerrorThatIsSkaPunk 12:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)TheTerrorThatIsSkaPunk, 19 february 2007, 14:03 | |
Alright.[edit source]
Finally, a topic I'm (kinda) Pro on. Ask away at me, I'll be able to answer most any questions on this one. (P.S. I know I'm a nerd, stop telling me already.)
Hints Section removed[edit source]
I thought it would do the article some greater good to have removed that part of the article. It was kind of unnecessary and unfunny from the get-go, though, if you ask me. -- Hanyouman 21:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)