Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Hell Outta Here

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Hell Outta Here[edit source]

After another round of edits and revising, it's back. Yes, the article about the famous Zork 3 weapon. Previous reviews are on the talk page, if anyone cares. --Andorin Kato 01:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

The Hell Outta Here
is being reviewed by
CajekHi!
Your Source for Fine Scented Pee
And Whatever Else Comes Out Of Him

Skimmed Lego's previous reviews. Let's check it out... --  Le Cejak <-> 03:25, Nov 14

Humour: 7.2 avg of all sections
  • [8] Intro

I like the intro. I'm mystified.

  • [7] 1 The weapon

It goes too far in the middle part (maintenence), and somehow, not far enough in the description of the weapon.

  • [7] 2 History

I found myself wishing this section was longer and more crazy. Go ahead and work on that, if you want.

  • [8] 3 Firepower

I like it, but could you conceivably go even more overboard? That would be really good. These sections are really short!

  • [6] 4 Examples of Use

I feel like I'm missing some kinda in-joke here, and it's not just the template at the top telling me that. This is a list, and it's nearly giggle-worthy, but it's just too random/in-jokey.

  • [n/a] 5 See Also

Oh. It's from Zork. I... don't care about Zork. Don't mention Zork. Stop talking about Zork.

Concept: 7 I, like LJLego, really like the idea of having "the hell outta here" be a weapon, however, and this is why you didn't get a 10, this is an in-joke. That's bad. Please lose all in-joke references to Zork. I've never played it, but you should definitely try to appeal to a wider audience with this. This has tremendous potential.
Prose and formatting: 8 Above average. I wish the sections were expanded, however.
Literecy-cat.jpg
Images: 9 I can't think of anything to criticize on the images except that I've seen them all before.
Miscellaneous: 7.8 avg of all scores.
Final Score: 39 This is fun to read, but it's too short and "in-jokey" for me. I think I covered what needs to be done in the above. If you have any questions or if my review didn't do it for you come see me.
Reviewer:   Le Cejak <-> 03:25, Nov 14