User talk:Ross McGovern

What's the deal with your Scotland post? Why are you fiercely guarding it from being edited? Huh?

You removed a reference to something that other articles now link back to the Scotland article with. The idea is supposed to be that the Scots spend a lot of time throwing things into canals. There's no need to delete that just to put in the bit about bleak literature. The bleak literature bit was funny so why not just write an additional section about it rather than delete parts of an already highlighted article? There's enough crud on here without deleting good stuff. --The Lad Himself 19:05, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Now I understand, fair enough. however that does not explain removing things that I think added to the article such as a longer list of exports, describing in more detail the mass mumbling of flower of scotland at football games or removing repetitive town names. Perhaps the "Please note that all contributions to Uncyclopedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then don't submit it here" is untruthful then? I am not trying to criticise just trying understand your motivation, as it makes no sense to me and I want to make sure I don't blunder in again.

If you remove the 'please write about' section, move it into recent articles. Try not to just delete it, mmmkay? --Chronarion 19:59, 11 Mar 2005 (EST)

Roger. I only removed stuff I'd put there myself but will leave it or shift it over in future. Soz.--The Lad Himself 04:36, 12 Mar 2005 (EST)

Evil Robot Thingys

Not sure if the site will let you redirect to an outside URL like that, so I went with second best and redirected it to George W. Bush. --Uvula Donor 14:37, 21 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Heh. Heheheh. That'll do.--The Lad Himself 15:01, 21 Apr 2005 (EDT)