User talk:Ericap
Welcome![edit source]
Hello Ericap and Welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
Useful guides and reference for your contributions:
I hope you enjoy the site and being an Uncyclopedian. Always remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you want to start an article of your own it is usually best to start it within your namespace, for example, User:Skid 40145/Article about stuff. If you do this you can edit it at your leisure and move it over into the mainspace when it’s done. To start an article in the mainspace attach this template - {{construction}} to your work, so other Users will know you'll be back to finish it.
Should you need any help, do not hesitate to ask me on my talk page or ask at the Village Dump Forum. You can also add the following: {{help}}
to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced writers straight to you. Simply put {{adoptme}} on your Userpage to join. Once again welcome to the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Narudo[edit source]
You said on Sycamore's talk page:
“ | The Naruto page. I think it needs more characters to make it funnier. I and many others addded some in the past, but RomanDogBird has decided to shorten it, making it safe and boring. He says we don't need many characters, but has he NOT seen the pages for Neon Genesis Evangelion and Street Fighter? Not to mention Sailor Moon's page as well. See, those pages are funny because there is lots of funny. We need that for the Naruto page so we can ease the Narutards (which he called me by the way. I feel degraded) | ” |
- Naruto is already safe and boring. I'm not sure how you can get any enjoyment out of it.
- Why do those other three pages matter? Two of them are probably worse than the Naruto one. What are you trying to say? I'm only trying to have some limits to this shit. Too much isn't always a good thing. Naruto is a pretty long series (even though it should have ended years ago), is it really THAT necessary to include every single character and his brother? Maybe a few more, but there's also the matter of whether the content is funny. You obviosuly don't think the Naruto page as it currently is is a funny article. And you are right to an extent. But Naruto the series is already a big joke on it's own, so it's kind of hard to top the real thing.
- Oh, so you aren't a Narutard? My apologies on that part then. My hatred of this series knows no boundaries at times, so I tend to jump to conclusions about some things.
You also said something about all of the people on the talk page being "in an uproar" over what I've done. This is not true. Most of these comments where left before I did anything to "mess up" the article and they are also mostly anonymous people who maybe came by once or twice and haven't bothered doing any thing since. As far as I can tell, maybe just the last two subjects at the end of the talk page are in concern of the article and my "murder" (for real? come on now, you can't murder an ar.......christ) of it. So no, it's you, and maybe some IP's who are complaining about what I have done. And these IP's most likely have lives of their own, and stopped caring almost immediately after voicing their opinions. Not that I'm accusing you of having no life either, but I will admit that I have no life to speak of myself, so I don't come off as a hypocrite.
Anyways, I'm tired of being a dick on this issue, and am willing to try and take you seriously over this. If you'd like to add more characters, please do so, but try to limit it to only the ones that, you know, have made some significant contribution to the series (not that Kishimoto gives a shit about them anymore), please try not to point out any blantantly obvious things regarding the series, try to use a little subtlety (I mean no "LOL LOL OROCHIMARU IS MICHAEL JACKSON LOVES LITTLE BOYS LOL, I mean, this is true and all, but like I said, SUBTLE not BLANTLY OBVIOUS IN YOUR FACE LOL bullshit), and, no, NO episode guide. What's the point? It doesn't really add anything. We have a policy on lists anyways.
oh god im tired of typing why did i do this i bet it doesn't even make any sense
I just realized something. The version you reverted back to? The opening paragraph and the caption under Naruto's picture were written by me! And the Naruto picture of him getting decked in the face was added by me as well. What the........ Look, ignore some of the things I typed above. I will include all of the characters you added back, but I'm going to have to modify some of them. There's just so much horribleness in it that...........this article is just a fucking disaster no matter how you look at it. Whether it's your version, mine, or the original re-write. I guess this means that:
fuck my arm is tired, aren't i one incoherent mother fucker?
-- Roman Dog Bird 19:27, September 14, 2009 (UTC)