User:Multiliteralist/Summit of Spin/enemies of Leonardo

Enemies of Leonardo are a group of people who, for some reason or another, want us to make Edison make look better than Da Vinci.

This series has been started. Join at any part you like! Someone else should write the Catholic Church spokesman bit since I don't know fuck about daVinci code. If someone has other ideas (instead of these, or as additional twists) by all means suggest them. Additional twists can just be added in between, this is not my show other than that I started it. If you decide to write one of these (or additional stuff relating to this idea) shortly, just start and link it in the list below. Check the already linked articles to see what is being done.

1. a newspiece to point out faults in Leonardo da Vinci's inventions. This one doesn't need to be long - in fact it is just about long enough as it is now. The "evidence" article can have all kinds of stuff thrown in, from different sources, to muddle the issue. (Started this one. Join if you like)
2. a mainspace article with evidence. Sporked stuff from uncyclopedia, Wikipedia, BBC news, wherever you find it. Twist the stuff you spork if it doesn't support the client's view that Leonardo was a twit. Link it to the above UnNews (when that's been done). The name of the "Evidence-article" could be along the lines of Leonardo Da Vinci's secret failures or something. (Started this one. Any true or false accounts of Da Vinci's inventions are welcome.)
3. a catholic church spokesman acts as an expert on the obvious wrongness of da Vinci, based on da Vinci code. This could be a mainspace article. Linked to the newspiece above. They should come out simultaneously.
4. someone (who, how?) reveals in an UnNews article that the said spokesman has been paid for by Enemies of Leonardo
5. Enemies of Leonardo deny the accusation in an interview (UnNews again). They get a bit caught there but sort of wiggle out by pointing out the accuser is not very professional because of (what? it can be found in the article perhaps, or maybe there should be some link where {whoever it is} does something lewd or suchlike. Maybe we should pick the character first {in some old uncyc article or so} and then write 4. and 5.)
6. at any point, an article that discredits this article on Edison. We are in the business of making Edison look good.
7. if other ideas come up, do them too.