Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly[edit source]
Strook 19:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
| Humour: | 0.5 | Umm...wow. That's really all I can say to this. Welcome to Uncyclopedia, Strook, and I guess I should tell you how we write articles. Basically, this looks like you took the Wikipedia article on this movie and made it about Gay Cowboys and Anal Sex. Really, that kind of thing is, not to fine tune it, completely unfunny and doesn't belong here. I know this may seem a bit harsh (i'm trying to dumb it down so UU will count this as in-depth), but the only way you can save this article from QVFD is if you rewrite it completely. Things like Gay Sex and Porn jokes are never really funny. |
| Concept: | 1 | Taking a classic Spahetti Western film and trying to make it sound like a Porn movie, with plenty of gay sex jokes. Like I said, virtually no one over 10 years old finds that kind of thing funny. I can see you put some work into this, so it's not just some drive-by sex joke, but I think you should look at the welcome message on your talk page and read some of the guides-it'll give you a good idea of what is acceptable in terms of humor around here. |
| Prose and formatting: | 2 | Well, you've got some section headers seperated from other, so it's not a completely jumbled mess. However, that doesn't mean you should skip proofreading this- you forget a lot of puncuation towards the end of the "Plot" section. Also, get rid of that last part- lists and random statistics are tedious and unfunny, and all they really do is drag your article down as a whole. |
| Images: | 0 | You don't have any. I can't really think of any images that wouldn't be absolutely disgusting that you could put on this article, other than a suggestive look on one of the character's faces. |
| Miscellaneous: | 0.5 | My overall grade of the article. |
| Final Score: | 4 | This kind of thing isn't really acceptable on Uncyclopedia, as saying "gay" or "sex" every two sentences doesn't make for a funny article. My best advice I can give you here is to rewrite the entire article as a whole. Change your concept to completely omit anything about gay cowboys or sex, and it might be salvagable. I'm sorry if you found this harsh- we were all new at some point, so we all have our rough spots towards the beginning. I'd recommend reading some of the links on the welcome message in your talk page- namely, the Beginner's Guide and HTBFANJS. Good luck in the future, and I hope you have fun here on the wiki! |
| Reviewer: | Saberwolf116 20:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC) | |