Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ricer
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ricer[edit source]
I've been working on this article on and off for some years now. I think it's pretty good; the humour doesn't just come from total randomness like most articles here, but rather from an hyperbolic exaggeration of the truth. Yet for some reason, many people are opposed to this article.
So please, let me hear your thoughts.Little Jimmy 02:07, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
| Humour: | 10 | Humor was the pinnacle of Uncyclopedian standards. This successfully parodies ricer behavior, and also contains a humorous ricer test. I wish more articles were solidly humorous like this one. |
| Concept: | 10 | Solid concept. Absolutely no plot holes and inconsistencies. Congrats on your legendary concept. I would rate this an eleven if I could. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | I would pay to read this. The writing was a sound example of a book about ricers. This could be published with the ricer examples which were perfect. I liked the beginning and end, and also had a great body. |
| Images: | 9 | Good ricer images. One is MS painted to add some lulz. The images were placed well and are completely relevant to the article. |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | No mistakes whatsoever. |
| Final Score: | 49 | Legendary Article. Would read again. |
| Reviewer: | James1011R 19:39, November 20, 2011 (UTC) | |
Thank you! Thank you very much!-Little Jimmy 03:47, November 22, 2011 (UTC)