UnNews talk:Egypt protests turn violently violent

Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood.

Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood. Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood. Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood. Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood. Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood. Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood. Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood.

"Ridiculously violent"

I'm not egotistically involved enough to petition or anything, but I would like to file a dissenting opinion. IMHO "ridiculously violent" is not an advertisement of the article's ridiculousness, but a figurative way of saying "The amount of violence has reached a level of utter absurdity", which in the case of this article is merely true. If it were an advertisement, IMHO, it would read "Boy, this article sure is ridiculous, right boys?" But I'll just agree to disagree here because I'm an easy going guy. User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:02, February 25, 2011 (UTC)

I can't decide which of the two is better, and fortunately, am not prepared to start a flame war. I will probably go to Illogicopedia and start a flame war there to vent my frustrations. Call it what you will, I guess the time for that particular inside joke has come around. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 16:56, February 25, 2011 (UTC)