UnNews talk:Class Pet Attacks Boy, Conspiracy Detected
A few days ago I was flipping through channels when I passed by this news story. I didn't see or get to know what exactly it was, but I saw a picture of a boy(?) holding something black and white(?). I really don't know, but a couple seconds later, this popped into my head. --Narf, the Wonder Puppy/I support Global Warming and I'm 100% proud of it! 23:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
Humour: | 4 | avg of all sections.
That was kinda weird. What does Donald Trump have to do with anything? Well, it was okay except for that. Not exactly what I would call "funny", but I'm fickle about that sort of thing. It needs to be more traditional. There's no reason for the animal to be a skunk as far as I can tell. Are you going to throw some bodily humor our way? I hope not.
This is way too random to be adequate or funny. I'm not even sure what you're talking about anymore.
I thought this was about a skunk that attacked a kid in a classroom.
When I looked at this title, WHICH IS ABOUT A BOY THAT GETS ATTACKED BY A CLASS SKUNK, I had no idea that Vincent Van Gogh would be mentioned. Again, I thought this was about a skunk that attacked a kid in a classroom.
Now what's going on? A contest? Yeah, I don't get it. I wanted to hear a clever classroom conspiracy, not something about black and white animals.
A list? no no NO, this article is about a skunk in a classroom!! ...or it's supposed to be. |
Concept: | 3 | Well, let's start at the beginning. You can see that your score went down and down as you moved further and further away from a skunk in a classroom. The original idea, while not gold, is "okay". However, when the "conspiracy" by black and white animals started up, things started getting totally random. Totally random isn't cool, my man. You need to take out all references to things that don't make sense when you look at the title of the article. Here's a quiz:
|
Prose and formatting: | 6 | The formatting is nearly adequate except for a few spelling and grammar errors near the beginning. |
Images: | 3 | The two pictures make no sense with the article. Again, why Donald Trump??? |
Miscellaneous: | 4 | avg'd |
Final Score: | 20 | I told you it would be harsh. Please get rid of everything that doesn't fit when you look at the title. I think I gave you the specifics above. Questions? Come see me. |
Reviewer: | • <-> 14:24, Nov 14 |