The War of the Ring/As approved by historians
SO you just read the previous page. You think a war about a casting a magical ring will defeat an evil eye whose master once served a void-spider is somehow real. How can anyone believe it? It's just bullshit. Ignore that time when people thought that thinking about world peace hard enough would bring it. How absurd! It's just a silly fantasy novel in the form of an epic quest! Because clearly, children's literature often have dark and fairly edgy themes with entire chapters dedicated to people despairing over the seeming inevitable of Sauron, while having several chapters just dedicated to learning about the history of the Rings of Power. It is just a silly fantasy story! Don't believe it!
Obviously[edit | edit source]
Obviously, the 'Red-book' of Westmarch is just pure bullshit. It is really developed from a long line of people who slowly altered it. Studies show that the Kalevala came way before either the Silmarillion or any of the other published works. Just...trust it! Don't think! Mindlessly obey the experts who give the correct opinionTM that you should also hold. Tolkien, for all his genius, could not hope to translate a document! 'Hobbitese' is an extinct language! No way could he do that! It is a silly story by people who wish they could get hot elf pussy! It's not true! That's why Peter Jackson and those fellow comradesTM made Tauriel, for fans to draw rule 34 over! It's obvious they want porn to masturbate to! But I am getting off track.
Bullshit abounds[edit | edit source]
First off, we have teh problem of dates. According to this totally accurate Wikipedia article, Tolkien was walking down a random river one day when he found a chest alongside the River. He opened it, and there was the Silmarillion, all 6 volumes and appendices of Lord of the Rings, and The Hobbit.
This page is a work in progress |