Template talk:Wilde

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Can we ditch the <small> tags?--Elvis 14:58, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)

We could ditch them, if someone (you) came up with another way to make the quote stand out from the page. Perhaps a special font or something. But that was the reason for the small - it caught the eye, by virtue of being different. --Famine 17:41, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)

How well does bold italic work, I'm all for highlighting them but they are sometimes to samll to read (for me anyway) --Elvis 19:29, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC)


{{{1}}}

It is already bold italic. And small. And completely fucked up. Part of the beauty of the small size is that quotes then take up less linespace on the pages. Anyway, here are some ideas - feel free to add more. --Famine 13:54, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)


"This is how my Oscar Template looks now." ~ Oscar Wilde on Reformatting the Wilde template

"This is my Oscar template without the small tags." ~ Oscar Wilde on Reformatting the Wilde template

"This is my Oscar template using the "code" tag." ~ Oscar Wilde on Reformatting the Wilde template

"This is my Oscar template using the "tt" tag." ~ Oscar Wilde on Reformatting the Wilde template

"This is my Oscar template using the "code" tag and a "big" font." ~ Oscar Wilde on Reformatting the Wilde template


Personally, of all of these, I like the code format the best, but it's almost smaller than the small tag. But the "big" tag around the code seems to be too big. Ideas/comments? --Famine 13:54, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

WildeQuotes.png Is how the quotes are rendered for me (Netscape 8.0, Firefox Render Engine, looks pretty much the same using the IE Engine) I personaly prefer teh code or tt tag as it's diffrent and not too large and still readable --Elvis 16:24, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

And as I see yours and mine:

Wilde text.png


This is also with Firefox (1.0.6), but on a 19" LCD with font sizes increased, so I can read them. ;) I believe the difference has to do with a "minimum text size" setting. Now that I understand your problem (thanks for the sshot, it made a world of differnce) I think the "code" tag is our best bet. Do you concur? --Famine 16:55, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I switched to Code, and I also put a dotted blue border around the quotes. I don't know if this is good or not, so I left it until I get feedback from others. If we keep the blue border, the code might be unnecessary. If we ditch the blue, the code is necessary. --Famine 18:22, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Easy come, easy go. The blue border sucked. --Famine 19:03, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Cool I can actualy read them now :-)--Elvis 07:04, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

The quotation marks do not match the one on other quote templates. --Kzrgyzstan 01:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Why isn't Oscar Wilde blue-linked?

209.212.5.67 15:49, March 11, 2011 (UTC)