Well, I've edited the article so its sections more resemble the Wikipedia Microsoft article. I advise that if you can't think up of anything funny about Resident Evil plots, then you try to parody the Microsoft article instead. Wolf ODonnell 14:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- This article has been Pee Reviewed. The results of the Pee Review can be found here. When editing the article, please bear the results of the Pee Review in mind.
Currently, the article is parodying certain events in the Resident Evil games and contains at least one mick-take of a real product. I'm currently using Wikipedia's Microsoft article as a style basis, but am currently unsure as where to go from here. --Wolf ODonnell 09:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, Dr. Fenwick for your response. This article requires a few more reviews as it has been updated since Dr. Fenwick's contribution. Thank you all in advance. Wolf ODonnell 09:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
| Humour:
|
6.5
|
It's funny but it feels like it's lacking in some areas mainly the middle, the middle of the article sags a bit.
|
| Concept:
|
7.1
|
Funny but only people who've played Resident Evil or seen the god awful movies.
|
| Prose and formatting:
|
6.8
|
Get this proofread.
|
| Images:
|
4.8
|
Besides the logo u have i believe one more image? Either way their forgettable.
|
| Miscellaneous:
|
8.3
|
Controversy was funny.
|
| Final Score:
|
33.5
|
This article is pretty good but again you ahd to have played the games to appreciate it, hat will hurt you if you want to get it featured. Also get better images, but keep the logo that bit is funny.
|
| Reviewer:
|
--Dr. Fenwick 20:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
|
