Talk:Surrealism

I think this article should be removed from the Incoherent Category, since it is a very lucide definition by demonstration of one of the least-definable terms in art, and therefore not incoherent at all. What do others think? --Menace3society 16:46, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Well, if you think that the monkeys have boxes and the left arm is without the conspicuos thread, then I couldn't care less. Maybe. Or even so. It depends on the electricity flavor. Tanketai 17:12, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Sorry to be boring and stuff, but you guys are using absurdism not surrealism.

Nope, it's surrealism - of which definition is the liberation of mind, thought and expression, whereas absurdism proclaims the futility of approaching a rational and comprehensible reason for existence. Btw, why hasn't the article been tagged BFI yet? Too obvious, perhaps...? --Thandruin 15:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)