Talk:Pornography

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Pornography. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

Bisexuals

We do not exist. We have never existed. --Moth on the web (talk) 16:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

You'll have to ask Pornotube about that, I think that's where the image came from. I imagine bi users are either asked to click on gay content in the hope that it will be more widely rainbow-coloured, or perhaps click on both the straight and gay links, and tile windows horizontally. Please note that in the main article Bi and Large does get a mention. Leverage (talk) 06:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Help

Redwarn says this page is extended confirmed protected, however, it displays the fully protected padlock, aka the goldcock, why is this? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Teh Epik Duck (talk • contribs)

This is because we have blue cocklocks but Jack Phoenix is too busy writing longwinded rants about artificial intelligence that ignore the issue we were discussing to do anything for this site. Seriously though, I encourage you to message Jack on his talk page about the blue cocklocks for extended confirmed protection. He did a good job with the other ones but has been sitting on this for years. MrX blow me 21:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)