Talk:Philosophy
"art or science"[edit source]
Unless the article writer is trying to be extremely ironic, I'm pretty sure he doesn't understand the fact that philosophy exists on a different dynamic from science and doesn't really make any claims to be "science" to begin with. This sort of makes the article not incredibly funny, unless, as I said, the writer is just playing off that and emulating someone who actually DOESN'T know this, but does himself.
I agree and also think something should be done, but I am also too lazy to change it, so someone else please write something funny in its place.
Quotes[edit source]
Why were some of the quotes removed? I thought some of them were pretty funny. --VikingofRock 20:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
I thought that it would be good to disallow any links to this page... you know, as a way to stick it to Wikipedians who want to link everything to Philosophy... but would this cause problems with Philosophy being considered an orphan? Does it matter with this website? – Preceding unsigned comment added by some ip (talk • contribs)
- Technically it can't be done. That, and I'm about to rewrite this (maybe) so would like it to be linked to. Nominally Humane! 05:43 04 Apr