Talk:People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

Does any one mind if I make some major changes to this article? --Gunny 11:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Go ahead.. seeing as it isn't funny. Though frankly, I can't think what funnyness there is to be had from an insidious terrorist organisation like PETA. It's not even funny when it turns out they kill more animals than they save, that they spend more money on lawyers than animals. PETA just isn't funny period. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.138.247.173 (talk • contribs)

PETA is misunderstood. We believe in peace and don't participate in any acts of terrorism. PETA is not the group that takes animals from labs or throws red paint on fur. It's completely misunderstood.

I'm a member of PETA but I don't mind Uncyclopedia making fun that's what it's for! I love "People for the Emancipation of Titties and Asses" that's clever. But some of this just isn't funny. I'm making fun myself! I'm posting stuff that's totally not true and would upset a lot of my fellow members. But that's Uncyclopedia! Miley Spears 05:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Saving PETA

The article is currently in the category Incoherent and marked for possible VFD. The article is awful. It's mostly a jumble with a lot of not-funny "I hate PETA" stuff.

But there's some good parts. I've already worked on rewriting the first two sections so they are at least coherent and hopefully funny. I want to redo the entire article. I'm a total n00b here (just started today, 6/9 of 2009), so jump on in and help! Miley Spears 09:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Check it out I think it's funny now. But you can make it funnier! Miley Spears 07:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)