Talk:Music theory
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Music theory.
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Article policies
| |
In my opinion, this article is long overdue. (Okay, I'll give Uncyclopedia a break, as they've only existed for less than a year, if what it says on the main page is true.)
I disagree with most of the sentiments, like racism and tripped beatniks, expressed in the article. Even though I wrote it. Go figure.
- This is me again, the writer of the article. I haven't edited this article for some time, and this is because honor roll is a little hard when you're taking physics in 10th grade. But no matter, I'm enjoying it. So I plan on adding harmonic progressions before intervals because intervals are hard to make funny. Alternatively, I could just add in some deus ex machina explanation for the abolition of intervals, but that's taking the easy way out.
- Wait... this is discussion isn't funny? Darn. -Gracenotes 23:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Here I am, talking to myself again. I don't do this usually. Forget it; I do. Never mind. A couple of notes on where people have taken my article:
1. 58.169.4.120 added something factual, and even helpful. I don't think that this belongs on Uncyclopedia.
2. 130.215.168.107 added so many edits. Good job! However, it doesn't fit with the tone of the rest of the article. I have no idea when Uncyclopedia went from tasteful satire to unbribled insanity.
I'll try to fix these perceived problems soon. Meaning, within a year or so, which seems to be consistent with my usual rate of fixing things online. Gracenotes T § 01:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm 130.215.168.107. Feel free to edit my edits as you please. As for the "unbridled unsanity", I was trying to follow the general tone of the article :p. John1728 23:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)John1728
- I'm the one who added the section on triads. Now I've created an account so its not anonymous. If you don't like it you can delete it. Freeflux 23:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)