Talk:Marty Friedman/Marty revision8

....This need better funny

Yah...that sums it up...even a vandalized article is better than an un-funny one..please, anyone who CAN edit, please help this article out... – Preceding unsigned comment added by Kowaru (talk • contribs)

I'm not sure you've seen the entire article. This page is 1/27th of the entire article. Perhaps this is what you are looking for. Or if you really like vandalism, this or this is. If you are confused by the thing at the top that says the page is locked, that is because you are confused; it is actually fake. --monika 00:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Listen...we have an obligation to provide easy to access funny..not some switched up MOFO labarynth of links. Besides, what's the difference in article titles, if someone wants to get to the FUNNY article, then what should they enter into the go bar instead of Marty Friedman....the old article is funnieranyways, I can't even tell if there's a joke in the one that there is right now. And that means the article goes from being funy, to being dis-information, which isn't what we're here to do --Kowaru 03:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

People who don't get jokes can't spell "funny" don't deserve jokes. --monika 03:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

How did you even get to this page without going through the main Marty page? --monika 04:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea...but somehow I did--Kowaru 04:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, here's a brief breakdown. If this doesn't work, I don't know what will.

• The page Marty Friedman is the real uncyclopedia article even though it claims to be fake (or rather, old). It is what appears when you search for Marty Friedman in the search box.
• This article that we are discussing is a fake uncyclopedia article even though it claims to be real and locked. The only way to get to it is to click on the links in the real article that lie and say this is the real article.

Hope this clears this up so you can get over it and stuff and go on with your life and be happy. --monika 04:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

That makes more sense. I think what happened is some other guy had linked to the fake real article as one of their " Also see" or " Realted articles" links, thinking it was the real one, so I clicked on it, and I tohught it was real too. XD..man that's fucked up..--Kowaru 04:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Funny. I guess they must have removed it. --monika 04:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)