Talk:Legends of the Hidden Temple
This entry is neither humorous nor well written[edit source]
If this is the type of article considered "funny" by the readers of Uncyclopedia, then the readers are illiterate, immature sociopaths. I do believe my time would be better spent listening to "Blue Collar Comedy Hour" -- and I despise it.
Arent you proud of yourself. tell ya what, you dont like it, you make your own fucking article. Dick.
And yeah, we are illiterate, immature sociopaths. Damn straight.
Dr. Eighties 19:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Um, the comment above is for the article that was in place before this one...~
20:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
NRV =[edit source]
Would someone please nominate this for "no redeeming value"? At least my things are semi funny, and yet everything I make gets nominated for it (literally). It's outrageous that this doesn't.
PhantomBPR 21:54, 21 January 2007 (UTC)PhantomBPR
From Pee Review[edit source]
I've finished up my second article in the Queue. I hope the reviewer enjoys it. --~ 
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
01:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 6 | The humor is sparse yet solid. Please add more jokes. |
| Concept: | 6 | A pretty narrow, but sticky topic. |
| Prose and formatting: | 4 | Pretty solid, kinda hard to read without title segments though. |
| Images: | 5 | NEEDS MO IMAGES, |
| Miscellaneous: | 6 | I think it has potential if you follow my recommendations. |
| Final Score: | 27 | It about average so far. B- |
| Reviewer: | Happy Weasel 17:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |
Concept is brilliant, but the execution could be better. 99.238.41.76 01:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)