Talk:Layman

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Layman. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

From Pee Review

I seriously like self-reference style articles. And this is another attempt at doing one. Since the concept is easy but the content is hard I never really liked my ideas withing this style. This piece is the first thing that I believe stands half a chance ( with the odd help ofcource ). -- Vosnul 20:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Not bad. There's a lot of broken links, so here's a tip: before you link something, check whether or not there is an actual article. Also, run your piece through a spellcheck on Microsoft Word (or elsewhere) before you finalize it. I did it to your article, and noticed a lot of typos, so I fixed them. Great piece though. --emc! ╬ 22:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for you help and comments !. I dont have any MS stuff , but i'll get some better english spelling software. ( Me an uggabugga dutchy person, so english is not really native to me). -- Vosnul 22:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, this is good- I reckon a little more could be made of the complicated sections (employ a plethora of inordinately esoteric wordings) but it's funny --Jamtrousers 10:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)