Talk:EvoWiki

Comment

This article contradicts itself. First it says that homosexuality would be selected against by nature, then it says that atheists accept it because "they aren't bogged down by religious nutbars". Of course, I suppose that complete contradiction is essential to satire. 4.158.210.163 21:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Biologists don't oppose someone just because they aren't acting in their Evolutionary interests. Darwinism isn't a religion --Uncle J 22:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh yes it is! And you worship Natural Selection. Here's the ritual: light torches around a big rock statue that says "Our Loving god Natural Selection". Then everyone bows down in front of it and chants over and over, "I will not worship God, I will worship Natural Selection". Then they pledge themselves never ever to even consider creationism. That's how it is! 4.158.210.101 01:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

And BTW: just because homosexuality isn't mentioned in the Ten Commandments doesn't mean that God is okay with it. He mentions it in Leviticus, telling them not to "lie with a man as one would with a woman; this is an abomination". Not all the rules come from the Ten Commandments, although they do pretty much cover the whole 4.158.210.101 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Please rewrite

Seeing as how the article on CreationWiki is aimed at making fools of creationists, this article should do the opposite, so there is a balance and the evolutionists don't have a monopoly on every single science and religion-related article here. 4.158.60.5 21:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

It's my article and I'll do as I please, besides aren't you still banned Beezwax --Uncle J 05:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Then let someone else have a turn 4.158.60.29 19:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)