HowTo talk:Write a Bad Uncyclopedia Article
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
From Pee Review[edit source]
These two articles are a package of sorts. That's why they must be reviewed together. An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays 20:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 7 | I noticed that the "How To" page was a lot funnier than the "Bad Article" page. The "Bad Article" page contains the exact same jokes as the "HowTo" page, they just work a lot better in the HowTo page. |
| Concept: | 9 | Excellent idea. |
| Prose and formatting: | 9 | Nothing specific to say here. Grammar isn't really relevant in an article with deliberately bad grammar. |
| Images: | 8 | Two funny examples of horribly photoshopped images. |
| Miscellaneous: | 5 | This low rating is directed at the "Bad Article" one. I don't think you really need it. I recommend that you fuse it with the far better Howto article. These don't need to be two seperate articles at all. They use the exact same jokes. |
| Final Score: | 38 | The Howto article is good, but I question the necessity of the Bad Article. Either add more to the Bad Article so it is more than just a rehash of all the jokes in the Howto article, or maybe try to fuse them. |
| Reviewer: | --THE 22:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |