User talk:Daocrat
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Geometric, arthimetic, or logarithmic? Does it involve LaGrange or Fourier? I hate those guys.--Flammable CUN 03:04, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- It's more like a fundamental Lagrangian or Hamiltonian. The set of all sets of idiots is greater than the TV set, and things like that. I'm into quantum mechanics, as you can probably tell. --Daocrat 03:15, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Schrodinger's Reality TV? Whoah. That could be a new article.--Flammable CUN 03:18, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- You do it. I'm falling out of my chair jsut thinking about it.--Flammable CUN 03:19, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- That could work. I'd pitch that to FOX. You'd get to see a cat get killed (unless it didn't get killed). People love that kind of thing. --Daocrat 03:22, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Or that everyone is alive and dead until... you turn on the TV!!!!--Flammable CUN 03:29, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Article created. --Daocrat 03:51, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Or that everyone is alive and dead until... you turn on the TV!!!!--Flammable CUN 03:29, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- That could work. I'd pitch that to FOX. You'd get to see a cat get killed (unless it didn't get killed). People love that kind of thing. --Daocrat 03:22, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)