User:Shabidoo/happymonkeycompetition/2014/Everyotherusernamewastaken
From Romartus[edit | edit source]
| Creativity | Humour | Originality | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5/10 | 5/10 | 6/10 | 16/30 |
I think this wasn't finished - and no illustrations. Seemed over reliant on the header to repeat the joke. Marked extra for originality all the same.
From Shabidoo[edit | edit source]
| Creativity | Humour | Originality | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5/10 | 8/10 | 9.5/10 | 25/30 |
A very good article written in only two days. You pretty much hit the brief of creativity, originality and humour. I like humour that contrasts between the subtle and then the over the top. You get especially high marks for originality (a reworking of the opening text, a chapter in Latin, grouping chapters together, totally different story lines etc.) Good job shit-bucket. Especially nice moments:
Creativity: Very creative rendition of the opening of the book. "shit experiment the size and scale of the Manhattan Project." No lack of creativity here. High marks.
Humour: Chippie aroma, moderately hot queen. Incomodiousness (lol). "if it were less objectionable, it would be less respectablee". I came across two LOL moments which is impressive in a short article.
Originality: Shitsy five. Green-apple-splatters. Sheep-dropping-moulds. Brown-tinted vision. EXTREMELY good idea writing a chapter in latin. I ran it through a google translate and it was funny (about as funny as google translate can tranlate). Great marks for originality. A lot of unexpected moments in this artile.
From Napoleon Khan[edit | edit source]
7/10
From The Wiki Man[edit | edit source]
9/10
Amazing! Love it! Very funny although the "Chapters 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 & 17: The Other Bits that you Don't Bother Reading" was quite stupid. I also had to take some points away for plagiarism. (Chatter) 
From IFYMB![edit | edit source]
6.5/10
From Sarah[edit | edit source]
6.5/10
Grand Total[edit | edit source]
70/100