User:Executive/Sandbox7

Mathematic logic is a context in math in which the solutions may be proven or disproven by locical reasoning, that is false because we know for a fact that logic is made by our perception and our perception is possible by our mind, so it is true to say that 1 + 1 = 11 or 1 + 1 = 1/2 or 1 + 1 = 0 or whatever you may see. The question about the existence of logic in math has been disproven since 188& when the professor David Hilbert implemented a “new” mathematical concept: the proof that state proofs. In his study he demonstrated that there are not possible proofs to demonstrate that math needs proofs at all. It is clear now that 1 + 1 is irrelevant because the result depends on the math context used, if we consider binary numbers, 1 + 1 differs but if we consider 1 as I, it is logical to obtain: I + I = Z. The disproven theory of logic in math may sound nonsense but Hilbert showed us why, we cannot keep laying to ourselves we always knew this day would finally arrive. Days when stating things like my pressure is 120/80 or my foot size is 22 or this is the 1st day of the year are gone… now is more like my pressure is €€?/@, my foot size is —_- and years are recursive so they never really end.

History

Many researchers from ancient past tried to give answers using logic and especially math logic, what a miserable era! I recall here an example of the episode of King Salomon: A woman crying argued that another woman took her son so the king decided to divide the child in half to avoid further discussion… this is an example of the use of logic to solve a problem and is wrong! They should have divided the son with a blade or similar you would never divide anything just with numbers!

Modern History

In the late 19th century a brilliant men would resolve the most hard and difficult problem of math, being the most brilliant mind of his generation and an outstanding proficient mathematician and then there is David Hilbert, an awkward and shy mathematician that will prove math is unprovable, making the impossible real or at least equivalent to -0. Hilbert was working on the Foundations of mathematics with a program that has his name but it is solely coincidental and therefore not deserving further explanations, he proposed that given a finitary set of proofs of consistency about anything related to math, it is possible to define the mathematical argument with a set of true axioms, universal axioms. That is equivalent to say that a hen made an egg because it was not a fart.

Mathematical argument

Given a set of informations mathematically relevant $\Gamma$ there exist a corresponding deduction $\phi$. Both operators are put togheter by the correlation $\Gamma \vdash \phi$, it means that $\phi$ is proven by all the set $\Gamma$. If just one formula in $\Gamma$ does not align with deduction $\phi$ then the argument is totally false. For example if $\Gamma$ is all mathematical operations, is possible to say that will exist a $\phi$ indicating $0*0$ that falsify the thesis that we can always moltiplicate, so using Hilbert approach one little argument make all the math in the world wrong or more precisely disproven. We can now say: math is broken, let’s dance naked until the end of time and celebrate our independence from math!

Pillars of the theory

Hilbert himself wrote these notes on a potato because papers was not heavy enough to hit people.

• For every $\Gamma$ exist multiple $\phi$.
• For every proof exist always a counter-example noted as $\lnot \phi$
• For every statement about something there is always a different interpretation.
• If just a single part of a larger set do not combine to form its $\phi$ then you can trash all of your work.

For example let $\Gamma$ be “every bikini sold in Arabia” it is immediately clear that the deduction $\phi$ approaches zero but… (see the image aside) she is $\lnot \phi$.

Broken math

It was a lovely day with a peculiar sunrise and for sure a spectacular Io.oo am when a young but sufficiently old in appearance Hilbert discovered what can be called a HUGE discrepancies in algebra as well as in chemistry and probably worse, EVERYWHERE! At that moment things changed drastically and somehow the word m6th lost its glorious meaning while the world was on chaos. People forgot how to solve daily problems and soon the entire society collapsed, even for a moment but that moment made history, the year was I88& and it will be never forgot. It seems that in different regions across the world the sun appeared in different colors and flavors, maybe due to the collapsing of mathematics or maybe as suggested by skeptics, due to an extraordinary volcanic eruption.

Proof

If we consider the elementary operations, we can create four distinct Gammas: $\Gamma$, $\Gamma '$, $\Gamma ''$ $\Gamma '''$. Each one corresponding to an arithmetic basic operation with every rule and mathematical axiom but remember these four $\Gamma$ are correlated so if one turn out to be false, all are too. Let be $\Gamma$ be addition $a+b=c$, nothing strange here, there is a particular condition though that we call $\lnot \phi$ and it is that all the sum of positive integer from 1 to $infinity$ gives $-1/12$ but this does not make sense and contradict the basic knowledge of addition, the sum of every positive integer must be a positive integer. This discovery made David Hilbert sure to investigate more about the glitches of mathematics and he did, when he realized that subtraction cannot be done with 0 and specifically he noted the non-existence of -0. Even more disturbing discovering that $0=infinity$^-1 and errors in the division and multiplication the core of our understanding of the nature around. At this point the operations we use are broken or disproved by the giant intellect of Hilbert, so what is the point to discuss about? Math is broken, it is not reliable anymore, let's rape and kill together there are no more cages!

Counter proof

There are not any at the moment, using Hilbert interpretations is possible to broke math but it can’t be proven that math is unbreakable because we broke it… all the deductions made already disprove math but to disprove the disproven theory of mathematics being always right we need more knowledge and researches. It is clear that math logic resemble more and more a snake eating its ass.

Conclusions

As it is said in China: "no matter how you search to define it, when the monkeys throw shit you just hope to be very distant". Our conclusions are similar but differs in one aspect we are not talking about monkeys but mathematicians throwing arguable proofs and counter proofs as quick as possible to each other, the unique precise thing that has to be sad is math proved that math is "inconsistent" therefore "inaccurate" therefore DEAD. We all know we have failed miserably so why do not go back to the primordial animistic essence of life and stop worrying about 1 + 1 equals something, because you know life is short, how much I cannot say precisely due to the fact that I do not do math anymore.

Internal links

• Math
• Logic
• Philosophy of Science