User:☯/Sandbox/Pee Review

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pee Review[edit | edit source]

I'd say something about an article I was submitting here, were I submitting an article to Pee Review. Lorem ipsum, pwn4g3, all that. - © 16:08 Apr 7

Good job, let's break this table down.   ~  '  SysRq!  Talk!  Sex! 19:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Humour: 4 This is an overview of JUST THE HUMOR of the article. There's a difference between humor and concept, although the two are very much related. Humor is the individual jokes that you use in your article. This is more about execution than ideas.
Concept: 7 Concept, on the other hand, deals with the idea itself. This is more about what direction you took the idea in. It's a bit more general and doesn't deal with each joke. It's possible to have a good concept but poor humor, and vice versa. This is why these are two separate sections.
Prose and formatting: 10 Prose and formatting deals with how pretty the article is, as well as how well written it is. Spelling errors, grammatical errors, formatting errors, they're all dealt with here. We don't fix them for you, that's UN:PS's job. We just give you an idea of where you're at in that regard.
Images: 0 Self explanatory. Only category that you can get a 0 in, and that's if you have no images. This addresses whether or not your images support the concept, are text based or not, are of decent quality, etc. Any problems diagnosed here can be fixed at UN:PIC.
Miscellaneous: 5.3 If the reviewer has nothing to put here, they will average your scores like so: {{Pee|4|7|10|0}} However, at their discretion, they can make this whatever they want if they feel they cannot cover everything in the above sections.
Final Score: 26.3 This is an opportunity for the reviewer to reiterate and condense the review into a paragraph. They tell you whether this article needs drastic improvement overall, whether it just needs some polishing, or if it's pure gold. Also, they like to offer help and such. Usually, you'll find links to HTBFANJS if the article wasn't that funny. Then they say something nice, hit save, and await UU/Cajek/Hv to come and check the review and add them to the big board.
Reviewer:   ~  '  SysRq!  Talk!  Sex! 19:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


All right, I think I got it. Is reviewing my next assignment, sensei? - © 14:49 Apr 8