Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kentuckistan

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

Kentuckistan

I'll take this one. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 03:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Good review, Razorflame! Watch out when averaging. More than 4 numbers and that Pee template breaks. Look at the code: {{#expr:(x+x+x+x+x)/5 round1}} (I fixed your scoring for you) Again, good job!!   Le Cejak • <-> 03:58, Nov 15

Humour:	8.2	*General(9)-Had me laughing a bit, but still felt a little dry. Maybe add some more humour? History(10)-Had me laughing throughout the paragraph. Nothing needs to be changed. Currently(9)-Had me laughing a bit, but it felt short. Maybe lengthen this section a bit? Demography(10)-Nailed this one on the head. Nothing needs to be changed humour-wise. Language(10)-Nothing needs to be changed in this. Maybe lengthen it just a bit though? Geography(4)-Felt very encyclopedic in its' description. I think that you need to take this and make it funny. Otherwise, maybe take it out? Agressive Chicken Syndrome(10)-Very good paragraph. No change. Advanced Weaponry(6)-I did not find this extremely funny. I suggest you take this section out of the article because I do not believe that it adds much to the article. Notable Kentuckians(6)-I do not find lists to be funny, and this is no exception. Although it did make me laugh a little bit, for the most part, it really didn't make me laugh.
Concept:	10	For the most part, this is a fabulous concept, and I believe that you took it to it's fullest. Good job!
Prose and formatting:	8	Red links are in the article, a few sections that are too short to be of any help in this article, and a little bit of grammar mistakes that I could see. Otherwise, you did good.
Images:	8	Images are prolific in this article, but humourous captions are not. Maybe add some humour to some of the later images?
Miscellaneous:	8.6	Average of the other scores.
Final Score:	42.8	Very nice article! Just follow the above and you will make this article fantastic! Keep it up!
Reviewer:	-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 03:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)