Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Gali
Gali[edit source]
Gali is being reviewed by Your Source for Fine Scented Pee And Whatever Else Comes Out Of Him |
Humour: | 4.3 | avg of all the sections
It's one sentence long, it's random ("Who's that? Why 1968?") and it directs you to another page that it doesn't need to. The introduction should give us a broad idea of where it is and what it does (not necessarily it's history).
Inadequate. Why does Gali smell bad? It totally comes out of the blue. It's okay to have a section on their neighbors, but it's random to just start talking about how bad they smell.
I was about to give this a 6 ("nearly adequate") until I realized how random it is. I like that thing about the white people's plan but... Why are the two tribes called Good and Bad? Why are you going on about the silver mines? You need to make this section "tighter" if you will.
You weave a strange and interesting story that goes beyond me having to critique structure and randomness. However, where's the funny? That's one thing: it's filled with too many random people to be funny, and therefore I judge
Bad. This list is not good in other words. It doesn't make sense, it doesn't tell a story, it's just bizarre. Bizarre can be fun sometimes, but usually just stick with the gameplan of the article.
This made even less sense. I don't know what's going on here. |
Concept: | 6 | Choose a country: write about it. However, you apparently didn't have enough material to write a whole article, so you started writing crazy stuff hoping it would be funny. It's okay, we've all done it. |
Prose and formatting: | 6 | Half of it is just lists. The part that isn't is fine, though. |
Images: | 5 | You only had one image. If you had two images that were both funny, your Image score would be 8 or 9, even. |
Miscellaneous: | 5.3 | avg of all the other scores. |
Final Score: | 26.6 | I honestly think that you could do a good job writing this. Get rid of ALL LISTS and make them into paragraphs, that includes the history. The sections that are really dragging the score down are "laws in Gali" and "Other Info". Other than that, it needs not an overhaul but a major touch-up. |
Reviewer: | • <-> 15:58, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |