Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Colin Powell

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

Colin Powell

Funny? Or... get it the fuck out of there to make room for a real article? pillow talk 07:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Good day, sir. I was going to put some witticism here to make myself stand out from all the other girls, but screw it. I'll take the review. I'll also try to make it a little less extensive than my last review for you. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Concept, which must be the basis of your article if I'm using this template:	7	I'm guessing your goal was to write this as many "average" Uncyclopedia articles are (random, stubby, nonsensical), except funny. At this, you excelled. Well done. Pat yourself on the back. I'm sure your parents are proud.
Humor, without a second u, because I'm American:	8	Fortunately for you, unlike most of the average Uncyclopedians that write the average Uncyclopedia articles, you actually have a sense of humor. Your meandering, pointless narrative found a good balance between randomness and humor, and it stuck to it. Most of your jokes managed to incite a smile from me, and a couple even produced a short, rasping chuckle. I especially liked the short, to-the-point sentences, as the lack of compound sentences managed to make the article seem both more and less professional, which makes no sense.
Your spelling and grammar, which probably sucks:	9	Good grammar and spelling throughout. Way to stick it to my section header.
Images, or lack of:	7	Your images are well-utilized, and the captions are funny. Having a cat picture was a very nice touch, as it followed the concept of the article (as I interpreted it) very well. The only reason this isn't a 9 is that I think the article could use one more image, though stands fine as it is.
Miscellaneous, not averaged, despite what some would have you believe:	4	To deflate your ego after my glowing comments in the other sections.
Final Score, totaled, as most would have you believe:	35	A very well done article, I believe this is very ready for VFH. Unfortunately, I've no idea whether it will pass or not, as it strikes me as resembling, overall, various in-jokes of the site. To my constant bafflement, a large portion of the site is unappreciative of in-jokes. However, I think the humor of the article stands well on its own, and I believe it stands a very good chance of being featured. If you remind me, I may even vote for it.
Me:	Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)