Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gwax |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Even me.. the dutchy.. thinks you guys have to keep this!! |
||
| − | <big><big>See how nominating anything for deletion is really bureaucratic? That's so you don't. If it's mostly crap, put '''<nowiki>{{NRV}}</nowiki>''' on it. If it's complete shoot-on-sight crap, list it on '''[[QVFD]]'''. Only list here if it's ''almost'' that bad but you can't improve it.</big></big> |
||
| − | |||
| − | {{Shortcut|[[UN:VFD]]}} |
||
| − | :1. '''Read: [[Uncyclopedia:Deletion Policy]]''' |
||
| − | |||
| − | :2. '''When adding an article to VFD, place <nowiki>{{vfd}}</nowiki> at the end of the article''' to mark it nominated for deletion. |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::2.1. '''Votes on unmarked articles may be invalidated'''; please make sure that you place <nowiki>{{vfd}}</nowiki> on '''all''' articles put up for voting. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :3. '''Sign your votes and edits!''' Use <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> or the "Sign" button ([[Image:Button sig.png]]). Signed votes are more credible. |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::3.1. '''Multiple votes on the same entry from one person (using [[Wikipedia:sockpuppet|sockpuppet]] accounts) is a [[Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol|bannable]] offense'''. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::3.1.1. No, really, it is, and it doesn't matter how 1337 U R, it's really bloody obvious. |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::3.2. '''MAKE SURE YOUR VOTES ARE CLEAR.''' Please put your vote in '''bold''' text. Make all the witty comments you want, just make sure your vote is '''visible''' and '''explicit'''. Example: 'Fucking '''delete''' this piece of dogshit article! It sucks!' --[[User:Slackerboy|slack]] 06:27, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)* |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::3.2.1. *''(maybe not that explicit)'' |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::::3.2.1.1. *Unless you have [[Tourette's Syndrome]]. |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::3.3. Please use bullets '''*''' at the start of your comment for the sake of organization. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :4. For pages that are created as a form of vandalism, contain no content, or are plagiarized, use '''[[Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD|QuickVFD]]'''. |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::4.1. If the article contains very little or very poor content, consider using '''<nowiki>{{NRV|~~~~~}}</nowiki>''' to indicate that the article has ''No Redeeming Value''; unless it is improved, the article will be automatically deleted after 1 week. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::4.1.1. NRV tags may be removed from an article '''if''' the article has been ''substantially modified'' or rewritten. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::4.1.2. NRV tags may be replaced with a vfd tag if you feel that the article has value as is or with minor modification (do not forget to list the article here). |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::4.1.3. NRV tags may also be replaced with '''<nowiki>{{WIP|~~~~~}}</nowiki>''' or '''<nowiki>{{construction}}</nowiki>''' tags by the author (since these serve a similar purpose) as long as the page is being worked on (within ~48 hours). |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::4.1.4. The individual who ''originally placed'' a NRV tag may remove it at any time. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::4.1.5. Removal of NRV tags for any other reason is considered a [[Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol|bannable]] offense. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :5. For archived discussions, see the [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion#Archived VFD Discussions|Archived VFD Discussions]]. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :6. For a list of unused images, click here: [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages|Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages]] [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages2|Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages2]] |
||
| − | |||
| − | :7. Templates up for deletion voting are here: [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/templates|Pages_for_deletion/templates]] |
||
| − | |||
| − | :8. If you edit VFD disruptively or unnecessarily, you will be banned without warning. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :9. Each section header on this page normally contains a link to the item being voted upon; please use <nowiki> [[:Image: and [[:Category: ...]] instead of simply [[Image: or [[Category: ...]]</nowiki> when linking to non-text. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :10. '''SysOps''', check the page history before deleting if you see something like it suspiciously changed titles. Archive old entries when they start to clutter up the page. Also, create a new archive page when the one in use gets ridiculously big. And also, get me a sandwich. |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::10.1. '''Never''' remove a serious VFD entry from the VFD, even if it fails. Failed VFD entries get archived along with the successful ones. A record of failed VFDs is important for future reference. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :11. '''New candidates goes on top''' |
||
| − | |||
| − | :12. '''Don't put underscores in your links.''' Underscores make them look funny. Use spaces, it'll still link to the same article. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :13. '''Please give all nominated articles a section of their own''': this makes voting easier to do and easier to interpret. |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::13.1. If you feel the articles don't deserve their own sections, they're probably not worth voting on; please use [[Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD|QVFD]] or <nowiki>{{NRV|~~~~~}}</nowiki> instead. |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::13.2. If you're grouping them because you're too lazy to give them individual sections, then you're being a dick and making more work for me; fuck off! |
||
| − | |||
| − | = See also = |
||
| − | Also see these fine pages for all of your deleting needs: |
||
| − | *[[Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD|QuickVFD]] |
||
| − | * [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/UndictionaryA-C|Undictionary deletion: A-C]] [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/UndictionaryD-K|D-K]] [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/UndictionaryL-R|L-R]] [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/UndictionaryS-Z|S-Z]] [[VFUDD]] |
||
| − | * [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/clones|Pages for deletion/clones]] |
||
| − | * [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/templates|Pages for deletion/templates]] |
||
| − | * [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/unusedimages|Unusedimages]] and [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/unusedimages2|more unusedimages]] |
||
| − | |||
| − | = Pages for deletion = |
||
| − | '''New candidates on top.'''<br /> |
||
| − | '''Mark votes with ONE *.''' |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==[[Mach 3 Triple Bladed Katana]]== |
||
| − | This is pretty crappy '''weak delete'''--[[User:Count of Monkey Crisco|Count of Monkey Crisco]] 05:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''Delete''' - NRV, straight up. {{User:Wild Weasel/sig4}} 13:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''QVFD'''. - {{user:guest/sig}} 13:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Comment''': This idea has so much potential, I can't even come up with the right word to describe it. The implementation is utter and complete crap, but if someone could rewrite this, preferably with a little bit of photoshopping involved, we could have an absolute gem on our hands. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 14:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==[[IPod Macro]]== |
||
| − | '''keep''' Good parody of how iPod's keep getting smaller. could use a re-write though.(re-edited-forgot to sign :O)--[[User:Bilbobaggins|Bilbobaggins]] 04:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Nuke''' unless the image is made less crappy. - {{user:guest/sig}} 04:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Weak for''' I like the concept, but the technique (the blending, etc.) doesn't work. {{User:Prettiestpretty/sig}} 13:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==[[IPod chair]]== |
||
| − | *"'''Burn'''," said the [[Spanish Inquisition]], "for we need no more iPods." - {{user:guest/sig}} 04:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==[[IHolla]]== |
||
| − | *'''Murder'''. I completely, utterly cannot get it, and the formatting and image don't please me. - 04:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Keep.''' --[[User:Gianthogweed|Giant Hogweed]] 06:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==[[Family Guy]]== |
||
| − | Horridly, dreadfully unfunny. Oh, HAHA! I GET IT! Everybody's from The Simpsons, and not Family Guy! OH MAN THAT'S CLEVER except not. --[[User:Consuelos|Consuelos]] 03:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | * '''NRV'''.--{{User:Jtaylor1/sig}} 03:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''MAUL''' - Jesus tap-dancing Christ, kill this. {{User:Wild Weasel/sig4}} 13:30, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == [[Ninja Wars]] == |
||
| − | *'''Delete'''. I wrote this page originally. But I've since decided it's crap. I just don't care to expand into all the links and it really doesn't make much sense. ~~Kerakazz |
||
| − | |||
| − | * '''Keep'''. I like ninjas and sword chucks. So why do you call it crap? Please, Look it over!--{{User:Jtaylor1/sig}} 03:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *<s>'''Delete'''</s> Unsigned --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 04:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Maul''' - Heartily agree with the author. Move to user page. {{User:Wild Weasel/sig4}} 13:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == [[Krismas]] == |
||
| − | *'''Ho-hum and Blah'''. It doesn't suck, but it doesn't say anything uncyclopediatric either. -- [[User:TD]] [[User Talk:TD|<sup>Complaint Department</sup>]] |
||
| − | *I'd suggest it to be '''improved''' instead. --[[User:Timestopper|TimeStopper]] 22:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''Keep''' - Rough, but promising. {{User:Wild Weasel/sig4}} 13:44, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==[[Southampton]]== |
||
| − | *'''Kill''' --{{User:SimulacrumCaputosis/sig3}}21:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Delete.''' --[[User:Gianthogweed|Giant Hogweed]] 01:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Save''' -- I'm a new user and think it's funny, give the guy a chance! |
||
| − | *'''Weak keep''', but it requires serious cleanup, redlink removal and formatting. - {{user:guest/sig}} 10:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Rewrite''' -- {{User:Codeine/sig}} 11:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Rewrite''' - Where is the picture of Phyllis Diller from her Magnum Opus comedy '''The Pruitt's of Southampton'''? (I saw it on reruns, but now I'm really showing my age) {{User:Prettiestpretty/sig}} 13:27, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Maul''' - Not bad...wait, it is bad. Oh so close to not sucking. {{User:Wild Weasel/sig4}} 13:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==[[Template]]== |
||
| − | *'''BALEET''': Oh look, it's a page with a bajillion and one irrelevent templates; please tell me there's no one out there that actually finds this funny. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 16:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Show mercy'''. I find that funny, strange or not. - {{user:guest/sig}} 16:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Useful for Noobs''' I have been looking to put together a list of templates I like to use... my guess is this is an attempt at the same. I say keep. Or rewrite it to be a list of favorite/really useful templates -- [[User:TD]] [[User Talk:TD|blabber]] |
||
| − | **You are aware of the existence of [[Templates]] and [[:Category:Templates]], right? --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 18:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Messed up''' gwax does make a good point. Since it is more organized, '''delete''' it. --[[User:Timestopper|TimeStopper]] 22:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Delete.''' --[[User:Gianthogweed|Giant Hogweed]] 01:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == [[Stoner]] == |
||
| − | |||
| − | * '''Delete'''.--{{User:Jtaylor1/sig}} 06:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *What was this guy smokin'? '''liquidate'''--[[User:Count of Monkey Crisco|Count of Monkey Crisco]] 10:11, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *<s>'''Murder'''. It deserves a stabbing.</s> Unsigned --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 15:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==[[Neurotypical syndrome]]== |
||
| − | Either should be deleted or rewritten, since most of it is taken from [http://isnt.autistics.org/ here]. {{User:Jsonitsac/sig}}23:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''Keep''' - Hmm... Creatable--{{User:Jtaylor1/sig}} 01:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==[[American Commitment to the Rights of Man]]== |
||
| − | *I think this belongs on a myspace or live-journal. I hear the "web"-"logging" is quite the rage these days --{{User:Flammable/sig}} 21:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Keep''' What's so bad with this page? --[[User:Timestopper|TimeStopper]] 21:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | **Reply on your talk page--{{User:Flammable/sig}} 21:43, 27 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | ***<s>I liked it too, but Flam is right here, the article was '''WAY''' too biased. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 15:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)</s> |
||
| − | :Bullshit. You bunch of pussies. Real satire is just too...oh *fear and trembling* it's too ''biased'' for Uncyclopedia. Jesus. I thought a few people here had the moral equivalent of testicles but apparently not. The only problem with the article was that it had a fair amount of factual material. Chickenshit candyasses. If you ever get a hair I got a copy of the article and I can repost it. If you ever get enough grit to stand up for anything other than "AAAAAA" and gamerboi crap, that is. ;) --[[User:One-eyed Jack|--OEJ]] 18:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | ::I'm convinced; I've restored the article and unless Flam deletes it again, we'll deal with this using the standard method of voting on the matter. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 18:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | :::I dunno, it just seems bitter. |
||
| − | But to sum up: the Bush administration views the US Declaration as asswipe. |
||
| − | The only human rights it respects are...uh. It respects the right...to...um. |
||
| − | Well, actually, there are no human rights that the Bush administration honors. |
||
| − | None. Sorry about that. Thomas Jefferson really has turned into Joe Stalin. |
||
| − | :::The question I ask myself with these sorts of pages is, if someone managed to write something similar on the right-wing side, would I vote to keep it? Is the language itself suitable as satire, or is it, in fact, angry/bitter. Maybe i'm not reading close enough, but I still get that feeling.--{{User:Flammable/sig}} 18:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *Personally, I would have voted to '''keep''' it, but I only have the candy equivalent of testicles. --[[User:Some user|Some user]] 18:11, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::OK, the "its unfunny" critique is justified. The article is also less than 24 hours old and my single brain cell does not work quickly. I'll go for less bitter and more funny in future revisions. Thanks for relenting, incidentally; I really didn't expect that (nor did I expect the Spanish Inquisition...yet here I am in the Comfy Chair.) If the vote goes against it after some revision, so be it. (heh, just noticed on rereading comments -- "too biased" and "not biased enough" -- ain't that the way it goes with everything? People want the opposite things from an article...)--[[User:One-eyed Jack|--OEJ]] 20:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | '''VOTE BELOW THE LINE''' |
||
| − | ---- |
||
| − | *'''Neutral''' (for now): I like it but I'm not sure if that's because I'm a damned dirty liberal or because it's actually good. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 18:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Keep.''' And I'm glad this came up, actually - apparently my testicles make a good bon-bon substitute. --[[User:Some user|Some user]] 18:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *Unlike most of you people, I have no balls, and my weinersnitzel is the size of a blue cartoon frog. I am therefore immune to the mockage of my genatalia, as I've already heard all the good ones. However, I must disagree with the previous posts and declare that this article IS biased. It's sin is that it is not biased enough. It's too close to the truth, so many will stop after it begins criticizing the Bush Administration and not read the juicy parts about how Uncyclopedia's reporters have learned that every Gitmo detainee has been fed into a combine (or some equivalent, I forget what). Anyways, it's a '''keep''', though I still think it needs some TLC to either be more or less biased throughout.--{{User:Bradaphraser/sig}} 18:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''BALEET!''' LameBlogopedia strykez again!! --{{User:Nerd42/sig}} 20:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *Contains too much of a personal perspective. '''Walk the Plank'''. --{{User:SimulacrumCaputosis/sig3}}21:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Delete''' Bias can be funny, but this reads more like a long, drawn-out editorial than a humor piece. --{{User:Naughtyned/sig}} 22:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Delete''' - Where's the satire? Donald Rumsfeld using the Declaration of Independence (or Constitution, I can't remember) as toilet paper? HAW haw HAW God that's good, I never thought of that. This is a clear statement of personal belief, fueled by bitterness, and leaving ''the funny'' lost in the lurch. Maybe insecure liberals (I consider myself a secure liberal, by the by) need something like this to let them sleep at night, but this is playing down to a Karl Rovish level in terms of mindless attack politics. Also, I'm just not sure how this article will help us win the War on Tourism. We need to be unificators - not disassemblers. — {{User:Wild Weasel/sig5}} 13:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | =={{tl|WIP}}== |
||
| − | *Due to advances in TimeStamp™ technology, <nowiki>{{construction}}</nowiki> serves the same purpose. Work In Progress is left in the dust. The <nowiki>{{ugly}}</nowiki> dust. --{{User:Keitei/sig}} 19:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Walk the plank''', matey! --{{User:SimulacrumCaputosis/sig3}}23:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Keep''' or at least '''redirect''' to <nowiki>{{construction}}</nowiki>. --{{User:MoneySign/sig}} 18:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Redirect''' to construction, mark as deprecated. - {{user:guest/sig}} 10:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Keep''': I don't think they're quite as redundant as you think. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 04:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | =Archived VFD Discussions= |
||
| − | |||
| − | <!-- Archive Box --> |
||
| − | {| align="center" border="0" style="background-color: #F9F9F9; color: #000000; border: solid 1px #bbbbbb; padding: 1px" |
||
| − | | '''Archived Votes:''' |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive1|1]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive2|2]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive3|3]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive4|4]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive5|5]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive6|6]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive7|7]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive8|8]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive9|9]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive10|10]] <br /> |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive11|11]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive12|12]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive13|13]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive14|14]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive15|15]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive16|16]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive17|17]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive18|18]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive19|19]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive20|20]] <br /> |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive21|21]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive22|22]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive23|23]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive24|24]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive25|25]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive26|26]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive27|27]] - |
||
| − | [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive28|'''28 (current)''']] |
||
| − | |} |
||
| − | <!-- End of Archive Box --> |
||
Revision as of 14:47, 1 March 2006
Even me.. the dutchy.. thinks you guys have to keep this!!