User talk:Kev

Please note that right now, this talk page is archived approximately once every week.
If DPL fucks up, please this page.

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials without adequate explanation, as you did at User talk:Kev, you may be blocked from editing. Notably, this section was not resolved. C'mon, Kev. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

C'mon.... And the reason why I'm so open to jokeblocking you is because so many other users want you seriously blocked that I can safely do so without the fear of getting cancelled. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  09:52am  April 18, 2021

Consider

Advertising VFP and voting in it. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

...and VFS. And every other VF(letter). JJP_Master 01:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

And PFP. JJPMaster, time to cast your votes.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Nah, only VFH, VFS, and VFP. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  09:52am  April 18, 2021

Uncyclopedia:Re-feature queue/Nominate

• Please nominate some articles for yourself
• Please clear it out.

Otherwise, prepare for an L4...Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I'll nominate articles anothertime. And fine, one article can be RFA'd for 4/19. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  09:53am  April 18, 2021

No, I mean taking an article that we nominated and adding it to the queue.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes another sanction for Gale

Unfortunately Gale is yet again not listening to other users and it being disruptive. He has been asked by multiple users, multiple times, over the last weeks to stop editing closed VFH and VFP. This is annoying because it both: 1) Clogs our watchlists wasting out time reviewing edit changes with pointless edits to old VFH (some of them from more than five years ago). And 2) He also sometimes has made score fixes of which he has made a few errors. Nobody cares about anyone's vote for something that has already been featured or already failed. Nobody even cares about a score fix for an old feature (even on the occasions when he didn't make an error). The last time I asked him to stop, he said he would stick to those no older than six months old (a terribly compromise because he just should have listened to users and STOPPED). But today he edited multiple VFPs which are more than 5 years old. When asked by yet another user to stop he just gave excuses and explanations as always. Can you please add, yet another sanction that he cannot touch closed VFH, VFP and VFD?. Sorry this is even necessary. ShabiDOO 01:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

And also do something to take action about him randomly mentioning his political beliefs in random unrelated discussions. JJP_Master 02:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

@Shabidoo: @JJPMaster: It's done: I just added three sanctions to help resolve these problems. Although I have a feeling Gale will artificially create another problem...

• Gale is forbidden from editing UN:PFP.
• Gale is forbidden from editing nominations which have been closed for more than 7 days on UN:VFH and UN:VFP.
• Gale is forbidden from displaying support for any political party that has incited insurrection within the last 20 years.

Hopefully this suffices... —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  09:56am  April 18, 2021

Yeah but wait a minute Kevin. The last sanction was terribly unclear and I would like you to clarify things. If the party indirectly incited insurrection but was a major contributory factor to that insurrection would that count? If the party tried to incite rebellion say 20.5 years ago but the rebellion only started 19 years ago would that still be relevant? Also...what precisely to you mean by support. If Gale were to say something favourable about a particular policy that party supported without clearly showing general support for that party would that be a violation of the sanction? This is all so terribly vague and open to possible arbitrary punishment I think you should clarify the shit out of this please. ShabiDOO 10:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

By this last point, I just meant "20 years from the final day a given political party has incited insurrection or has otherwise attempted to orchestrate a political takeover". For example, if the US Republican Party does not do anything from now onwards, Gale will be allowed to talk about it again on January 6, 2041 (20 years after the Jan 6 2021 attempted coup). —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  10:35am  April 18, 2021

I suppose that incredible vague and unclear explanation will have to do Kev. ShabiDOO 10:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Does this include in articles or only in talk pages? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Maybe just not mention politics in random places? ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  13:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

That doesn't stop the issue of using my sanctions as a toy to win a dispute. But yes, he still didn't mention if it's articles but given it's support, if I am in a neutral tone it probably will be fine.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:19, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I just wanna clarify (tho I feel kinda stupid cuz I think it was at least partially a joke) that it is okay to be a republican (nobody’s perfect). The issue is the unnecessary and useless insertion of irrelevant stuff in discussions. MrX blow me 19:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

It's my way of "limiting political discussion" since that automatically excludes politics in at least half of worldwide countries. It doesn't explicitly outlaw all of it though, but if Gale chooses to continue inserting politics in irrelevant manners, I'll have to impose a total topic ban. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  11:38pm  April 18, 2021

User:TedAddison2

TedAddison2 (contribs  • checkuser • abuse log) has been blocked, but we need to procedually revoke the talk page and checkuser them.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

No additional spambot accounts detected... —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  11:40pm  April 18, 2021

2A02:2149:88D7:B400:BDCD:475A:C7C5:5DBC

Can I be allowed to warn them for section blanking? Or can you at least do it? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done; templates {{Uw-blank1}} and {{Uw-blank2}} have been fixed too. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:20am  April 19, 2021

UnNews:New Cook PVI's released

I think it is ready now.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:16, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

It's probably never going to make it onto VFH at its current pace, but it looks good enough to stay in UnNews-space.  Done —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:24am  April 19, 2021

37.114.96.0/19

Please issue a {{proxyblock}}. Somehow was unaffected by Filter 89. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Issued a short-term (1 year) block. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:26am  April 19, 2021

Idea

Seeing as no one participates in PFP, I request to be able to make a forum to implement 1 of these 3 options

• Locking a successful VFP nom, similar to VFH. No editing at all once successful. PFP will cease to exist as a whole.
• Only allow PFP voting within a week. After a week, it auto-locks, similar to a forum. This is reset if another user edits during that time.
• Fully protecting any and all PFP nominations, to prevent further editing of them. Admins will of course still be able to participate, but they then must make it clear it's PFP voting, not normal VFP voting.

-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I would go option 3, but locking all PFPs would take a prohibitively long amount of time... —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:27am  April 19, 2021

@Kev: May I create such forum?Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Hurricane Beta released

Please withdraw. Probably not gonna succeed.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:32am  April 19, 2021

April 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Uncyclopedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at User talk:Kev. My "shortcut" is not my real name, and I do not appreicate you calling me "Gale". By implying I am a different gender indirectly, you are indirectly implying indirect transphobia. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

"Gale" is a gender-neutral name, but for the purposes of being polite I'll call you Gale5050 from now onward. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:34am  April 19, 2021

No wonder my sanctions page is 9k bytes!

Because there incredibly complex. I mean, instead of Forbidden from supporting any political party that caused insurrection within 20 years, shouldn’t it be Forbidden from discussing his political beliefs? Gets the point across much more consciely, and more clear. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your sanction list is ridiculously long because you refuse to listen to what multiple users ask you not to do...and you reply with stupid excuses and then do whatever you want. ShabiDOO 17:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

So? You're only defending 73% of the length. There's random excursions. I'll cite another example. The For example, moving User:Gale5050/Lorem ipsum to Lorem ipsum requires permission. Moving User:Gale5050/Lorem ipsum to User:Gale5050/Lorem does not require permission. should probably be removed. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Gale5050, I’d like to remind you that the sanctions are an alternative to blocking you for your consistently disruptive behavior. If you prefer the alternative, well, that’s your call I guess. MrX blow me 19:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't, but isn't 7k enough? Trim the excess comments! -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:36, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Gale you are breaking your sanctions by challenging them (and you are unequivocally challenging them at this point). Nobody wants to hear it. We are sick of your endless shenanigans. Start listening to people or fuck off. ShabiDOO 19:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

My wording is only 8k byts tho. It's more efficent.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

May I add you are being kind of rude.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations me. I managed to reduce it down by ~400 bytes. More conscience and fixed grammar.See User:Gale5050/Proposed new wording.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

The exact reason why your sanctions page keeps getting longer and longer is because you always try to get around them and new ones need to be added. Just stop challenging them or proposing new ones, listen to other people and your sanctions will be lifted. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  20:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I wish that would be true. Sadly, because I don't even have a say in them, even on May 1, it is at the mercy of other users, users using my sanctions as a toy to win disputes, ultimately, I wish you are right but in practice I'll be sanctioned forever, because in Shabidoo's eyes there will never be a net positive.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Just don't be a dick, Gale, and you won't have to deal with Sanctions. The sanctions are there for a reason, and until you accept that you have done wrong and strive to better yourself, the sanctions will most likely stay. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Did you even read the above? Please. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I read it, Gale. You've got a habit of diverting the blame on something away from yourself instead of just accepting the blame. I (and most other people, probably) really want you to realize that when you've got a large group of people constantly trying to inform you of a wrongdoing, they're not doing it out of spite or that they dislike you, they genuinely want to see you improve. All of your problems on Uncyclopedia would vanish if you just admitted your faults and fixed them instead of trying to always 1-up someone or deflect blame. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 22:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

But the problem is, Uncyclopedia is a bad system, in so many ways. I probably shouldn’t have joined uncyclopedia until I get unblocked on Wikipedia, which I’m not sure if ever, as I certainly have a lot of socking to defend, especially users who aren’t my socks, like the Phoner group of socks. These users are not my socks, but I have a lot to defend. This system allows for people to have equal votes, so someone who makes a strong argument has the same say as someone who makes none at all. In addition, the fact that an image or article can’t be unfeatured is bad, especially in cases where an article is meant to be featured in a temporary status. If you want to parady Wikipedia, also parody there blocking and topic ban system. This would not have happened on Wikipedia. And really, it’s a small minor conflict that exploded, which is why we are here. Shabidoo has denied all connections to me, at least in article building. A lot of my articles I put to peereview are sat to months partly because of grudges which is never correct. Nor is attempting to use sanctions to win disputes. Which is the worst part. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 22:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I guess I should clarify. On WP, there is a dispute resolution and talk page process. When you are tbanned, it is very rare (I can only think of two cases) of when it's booting you into something. You try lesser things first. Sadly that was not the case. My voice is being shined out, by me not being able to vote in PFP and having limited amounts of against votes at VFH and VFP, which is the first part of using my sanctions to win a dispute. The system is flawed because once an article is FA'ed, it is FA'ed forever, and whilst an image can be unfeatured, it has to be very close. On WP, when a discussion closes, you just bring it up again, kinda like a forum or VFD or a failed VFH/VFP. But if an article is featured on WP, it can be unfeatured. We do try to keep an article in feature worthy form, I'll admit, Hack wrtier was a destroyed FA. Sometimes bad articles (I can think of a recent example) wind up getting featured, and Zombie votes oppose more times then I do. There are more examples I can cite.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 22:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

All I am asking for is a few hundred bytes to be reduced. There is no reason this should have exploded, but like every other thing, people jump on me like I am a Gold Scar in Fortnite in Chapter 1 Season 3. (Albeit, negative way). This has to be stopped immediately.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:11, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Until you realize that you are the problem in this situation instead of blaming it on others and saying that everyone is "jumping on you," the sanctions will not improve. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 01:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Gale5050... please listen to what other editors have to say about you. Doing so is only bound to help you. And also, please use common sense!!!! —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:37am  April 19, 2021

Congrats on violating your promise above in mere minutes. Good job. Sadly, you may be cancelled for no less then 2 years...Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

"Gale" is a gender neutral name, don't be a dick and call people transphobic for calling you your username. I found out that my username (that I thought was unique) is an uncommon african women's name, but I don't go around calling people transphobic for calling me my username. You've done this before with calling something homophobic "racist," so I suggest that you don't throw around words to make you sound smart. More often than not, it will make you look foolish. Please listen to Kev, they know what they're talking about. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 01:43, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

But then you would spell it "Gael". At least call me that, and btw, you probably don't feel it the same as me whom got a 4im for similar behaviour; name indirectly implies gender.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The feminine homophone of gale is "Gail," which happens to be my grandmothers name. As for this whole "Gale" business, people have been calling you Gale for a while, I don't understand why, of all people, you choose to snap at Kev about it. If it really bothers you, I'll start referring to you as Andrew. P.S. "Gael" isn't right either. THat's a Gaelic-speaking person, not the feminine name. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 01:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I will say some users(MrX) typed out my full name and I got annoyed for a while, but today I just pushed it over the top. It's like a volcano eruption; they did it 1 too many times.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Kev, several other users here have patiently tried to reason with Gale and shockingly he isn't listening to anyone. This is the fifth time he has made a big deal about complaining about his sanctions which is becoming disruptive. If i were you I would block him at this point for challenging his sanctions (which he has kept doing even after you have intervened in this conversation). If you won't do that, at the very least could you please modify his sanctions so that: "Challenging the above sanctions" reads as "Challenging or complaining about the above sanctions". And if he does so again, actually block him. Nobody wants to hear his grievances for this anymore. ShabiDOO 05:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

You even acknowledge its complaning, not challenging, and its the page size. Kev has engaged in malicious page blanking, and no you are not being patient.How do i know? Bc you always go to Kev immediately, not trying to sort things out first.You probably did run out of good faith but, still. Like when I edited your article once, you immediately had Kev ban me from articles written >33% which was disruptive.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Gale...I have no more patience for your bullshit. Since you cannot listen and won't change...sanctions are the only thing keeping you from making this website a dreary, non-fun shithole. ShabiDOO 16:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

I put the "no challenging sanctions" rule in bold, increased the scope of said rule more than you, and made it punishable by 2-week sanctions extensions plus 2-week blocks. Hopefully this is severe enough... —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  04:30pm  April 19, 2021

Thanks Kev. You are a true trooper! I will send you a gift certificate for a free ball shaving, redeemable at any ball-shaving clinic in the world :) ShabiDOO 16:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Question from JJPMaster

If you claim that he "cannot listen and won't change", why would adding more sanctions be a better option that just indefinitely blocking him? JJP_Master 18:00, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

He would just evade the block by socking, like on WP. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  18:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

And also no more UnWeather, and just overall fewer articles. While they will be never be on VFH, having some is better then having none. It’s kind of like saying “why should we have this topic and interaction ban of sir Joseph and not just blocking him?” -it’s because of the positive contributions, so it has to be a big net positive to revoke all access. Blocks are hard, especially indeffs. It’s identifying risks of blocking, and being careful. Oh, and @JJPMaster:, stupid question - if you saw an unblock request of me on Wikipedia, would put support or oppose it? Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

I'd probably oppose. Given the fact that you have repeatedly admitted to socking (it doesn't matter if you're "making constructive edits on IPs"), and that you have made several users quite frusturated by your behavior on this site, I'm not sure you've changed well enough to be allowed back on WP. JJP_Master 18:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Generally, Wikipedia doesn't hold big grudges against you for other WMF sites, so this wouldn't have much clout, however I do see concerns over socking. But the standard offer does exist, so I may be able to get back. Uncyclopedia is different then Wikipedia. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

37.114.96.171

Somehow skipped abuse filter 89.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Filter 89 detects one specific character, which said IP did not use. I'll throw in something for those characters in at another time... I'm fucking exhausted. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:38am  April 19, 2021

ShellaRicker232

ShellaRicker232 (contribs  • checkuser • abuse log) is a spambot. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

User is sock of Merryknox80. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:40am  April 19, 2021

General note

How do I uncancel myself?? —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:41am  April 19, 2021

And why do other editors get away with using the short form? —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  01:41am  April 19, 2021

They don't but because I can't message other editors I can only do it to you. Feel free to cancel others for doing it though!Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:42, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Forgot to @[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]]: . @Kev: Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

—𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  10:47am  April 19, 2021

2021 storming of the Capitol

Please redirect that (and any similar titles) to UnNews:January 6, 2021. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 11:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  10:09pm  April 19, 2021

Idea

What if we include Celeste emojis in RedWarn, either in warning templates or in the actual reverting! Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 11:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

*cough* Go to Phabricator *cough* JJP_Master 12:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

But seriously, how would we do that? You can't include images or templates in revert summaries, and as for "in warning templates", are you advising that we go and add Celeste emojis to every single warning template, or that we should have RedWarn automatically add Celeste emojis next to the warning templates? JJP_Master 12:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Either one.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Also, Phabricator task filed. JJP_Master 13:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

User:2400:4153:84e0:ac00:b0ef:5b42:54b0:8cf7

Please extend to 2400:4153:84e0:ac00::/64. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

I won't extend IPv6 abuse filter blocks unless proof that three or more incidents of spambottery have occured on a given range. Sorry. It's to make sure that I can still admin efficiently. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  10:13pm  April 19, 2021

/64's is one user. No reason why not to extend it.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 22:33, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

It's because it takes time to block users manually, and I don't necessarily have the time to "re-block" users based on abuse filter entries. Autoblocks can take care of half of that. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  10:36pm  April 19, 2021

Question

I assume if I am confused about a set of sanctions, I will be allowed to ask, as long as I don't say anything negative, correct? Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Only things that are explicitly questions, like asking for details, without asking to modify the sanctions. For short, only clarifications. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  10:16pm  April 19, 2021

qvfd

Please check out QVFD. Also, when deleting the page Bruh, please use "bruh" in the delete summary. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Whooooooooooops. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  10:19pm  April 19, 2021

All hail the Hobo King!

Your High Highness

Congratulations on being crowned the new Hobo King Two, Your High Highness! -Rock-O-Jello ❤ (I'm listening...) 18:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm not sure if I'll accept to hold this title for long though.... we'll see. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  10:20pm  April 19, 2021

User:138.36.120.176

Please block for a month, and also use Huggle when blocking. Vandalized some more, and I rollbacked it as it was page blanking. I know it's kind of on the fence, but really, it's a net positive in any case. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Oh, and did even more vandalism. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:11, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

They're starting to vandalize Wii-kipedia!!! AAAAAAA!!! They must hate the Wii. Stop em, Kev! WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 20:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes, please stop them.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:23, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Huffed for 2 weeks. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  10:21pm  April 19, 2021

138.36.120.176

Is there any way to put him in UN:OFFICE? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:35, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

IPs do not go in OFFICE. Further violations will result in blocks becoming longer in length each time. —𝔎𝔢𝔳⠀Ꮠ  12:42am  April 20, 2021

Walter Mondale

The article must be updated following his death. [1][2].Rest in peace. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

That article already says he was lost in another universe in 1985. We don’t need to update it with his passing in the non-bizarro universe, that’ll mess it up. MrX blow me 02:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

merryknox80

Haven't tripped an abuse filter since 4/15, safe to block them.Spamblock + sockblock = permablock without TPA.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Heya...

Your userpage User:Kev/strawberry.css contains a double redirect.  –     (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 02:37, 20 April 2021 (UTC)