From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
All scores, at least in the humour section, have been given a small amount of mercy points to compensate for me being an asshole.
| ELITE REVIEW COMMITTEE
|
Article Reviewed by Member: Unsigned
|
| Humor
|
17/20
|
There were a few chuckles here and there. A rather good article. QFH quality at minimum.
|
| Concept
|
8/10
|
No Comment
|
| Formatting
|
7/10
|
Rather than showing actions like this <points there>, actions done like this (points here) or this [points here again] might look a little better. Since it's a monologue/book article, it isn't going to be organised in the best manner.
|
| Prose and Mechanics
|
9/10
|
I didn't see many errors, if any.
|
| Illustrations
|
7/10
|
They fit into the article, and are consistent in style, but there's something I cant place my home row on...
|
| Completeness
|
10/10
|
Everything tied up rather well.
|
| Coherency
|
9/10
|
Coherency isn't needed in this style, really, but it follows well in a stream of consciousness.
|
| HE Rating
|
0/10
|
|
| Reccomendation
|
Yes
|
| Total
|
53/70
|
Well done.
|
|
| How's my reviewing? Let me know by flling out a report in my Reviewer's History
|
| ELITE REVIEW COMMITTEE
|
Article Reviewed by Member: Unsigned
|
| Humor
|
16/20
|
Gay jokes seem to dominate it for the most part in addition to (possibly) a few allusions to the character I was unable to detect.
|
| Concept
|
7/10
|
I do not know who Horatio Hornblower is, and a Wikipedia article isn't going to make an adequate substitute here.
|
| Formatting
|
9/10
|
Formatted was quite good, although the Web .98b-ish {{Q}} is used. It's like that one stain on the you can't get off your otherwise good.
|
| Prose and Mechanics
|
9/10
|
Again, I didn't see any real errors during my trek through.
|
| Illustrations
|
8/10
|
Decent pictures that gave some smile.
|
| Completeness
|
9/10
|
There isn't a real need to tie up. The character was explored well.
|
| Coherency
|
10/10
|
It made sense.
|
| HE Rating
|
0/10
|
|
| Reccomendation
|
Yes
|
| Total
|
51/70
|
Yay.
|
|
| How's my reviewing? Let me know by flling out a report in my Reviewer's History
|
| ELITE REVIEW COMMITTEE
|
Article Reviewed by Member: Unsigned
|
| Humor
|
12/20
|
Average in quality, really.
|
| Concept
|
7/10
|
A fair concept and subject matter.
|
| Formatting
|
5/10
|
The article looked like it was cut off, and pictures were in chaos.
|
| Prose and Mechanics
|
5/10
|
Words are misused (overseas, not oversees), and commas are sometimes missing or misplaced.
|
| Illustrations
|
6/10
|
Relevent, but text-based in one. At least one IIRC is unoriginal, another looking unoriginal but I do not know. The remaining contribute decently.
|
| Completeness
|
5/10
|
It looked like it was never completed and it never wrapped up. The subject could be written about better, and an infobox used.
|
| Coherency
|
6/10
|
The article seemed a little broken, and a bit off-topic sometimes.
|
| HE Rating
|
0/10
|
|
| Reccomendation
|
Yes (Barely)
|
| Total
|
35/70
|
Meh.
|
|
| How's my reviewing? Let me know by flling out a report in my Reviewer's History
|
| ELITE REVIEW COMMITTEE
|
Article Reviewed by Member: Unsigned
|
| Humor
|
18/20
|
What can I say? I enjoyed it.
|
| Concept
|
9/10
|
Good.
|
| Formatting
|
6/10
|
My browser makes a big gap between the intro and the TOC. The article has an uncomplete feeling at the end.
|
| Prose and Mechanics
|
9/10
|
I saw nothing.
|
| Illustrations
|
8/10
|
Good. Decently modified. The second gave me a sort of good
|
| Completeness
|
7/10
|
The article looks cut off at the end and thus could do well with the addition of a "see also". A little more depth would be nice as well.
|
| Coherency
|
9/10
|
No Comment
|
| HE Rating
|
0/10
|
|
| Reccomendation
|
Yes
|
| Total
|
52/70
|
* Golf Clap *
|
|
| How's my reviewing? Let me know by flling out a report in my Reviewer's History
|
| ELITE REVIEW COMMITTEE
|
Article Reviewed by Member: Unsigned
|
| Humor
|
19/20
|
Quite funny.
|
| Concept
|
7/10
|
A fair concept and subject matter.
|
| Formatting
|
5/10
|
Can't give you many points here because it's all in images and there is an excessive use of horizontal rules. Arial Black was not a nice font choice. Century Gothic (normal) would have given a little better children's book feel.
|
| Prose and Mechanics
|
8/10
|
Nothing seems out of place.
|
| Illustrations
|
10/10
|
It is the story, and it's in PNG so it's nice and focused, and that's a bonus.
|
| Completeness
|
9/10
|
Complete.
|
| Coherency
|
8/10
|
Made sense.
|
| HE Rating
|
0/10
|
|
| Reccomendation
|
Yes
|
| Total
|
51/70
|
!
|
|
| How's my reviewing? Let me know by flling out a report in my Reviewer's History
|