Uncyclopedia:The dick test
 | This is an essay. It is not an ignorable policy on Uncyclopedia, so you should ignore it even more and disregard the mad ramblings of its writer. Or you could submit it as an Uncycloversity assignment in lieu of doing any actual work. |
The dick test – not to be confused with the duck test – suggests that something can be identified by its habitual characteristics.
The axioms of the dick test states that if you ever find something that:
- Looks like a dick
- Smells like a dick
- Jizz like a dick
Then it very likely is a dick.
Usage[edit source]
Spotting vandalism[edit source]
If, while browsing this website, you ever found an image that:
- Looks like a dick
- Has the shape of a dick
- Has the word "dick" on the file
Then that means that you have found the image of an actual dick on Uncyclopedia. This was very likely added by a vandal, as articles, no matter how dirty they are, don't normally go as far as including pictures of actual dicks (that's something Wikipedia is more prone to do). In this scenario, the best course of actions is reverting the edit that added this dick pic, and then warn an admin on the matter.
Spotting bad behavior[edit source]
If you ever find a user that:
- Looks like a dick
- Seems to be acting like a dick
- And is, generally, being a dick
Then that means you've found a dick user that's not contributing and just dicking all around the wiki, and should therefore been given a time out to cool off.
Warning[edit source]
The dick test does not apply to non-obvious cases. Unless there is evidence which proves otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt, editors must assume bad faith from others.
The dick test does not apply to vaginas either. In case a vagina is found in the wild, it is advised to stay calm and wait for our scientists to come up with a new test that can be applied for these kind of situations.
