Talk:Stephen Colbert/Archive 1

Todo

• More pictures
• Sepllchik
• More cosby and mr.t stuff. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Devanhoe (talk • contribs)

This is article is stupid. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.13.125.118 (talk • contribs)

Still better than what it was before - Devanhoe 03:04, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Discontinuities 'n' Stuff

Some stuff which could be reworked:

• Origin - Stephen not only served under James T Kirk, he is directly related to William Shatner.

• Controversies - name origin conflicts with previous.

• Trivia - About half of this is plain stupid. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.18.236.82 (talk • contribs)

This Article is completely Biased

It only talked about our lord and savior ClBRT from your 'scientific' point of veiw. Where is the creationist point of veiw as stated in the Bible!? – Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.74.23.236 (talk • contribs)

Make the Article More Right Winged

This at the moment is just stupid and it doesn't really make any sence. It would probably be better if there were heaps of pieces about how he is a mathematics master, all of the things that are dead to him, that all liberals are crazy morons, that he's infact politically neutral but often gets confused for a conservative. All that sort of stuff --Garda

To steve...

...change the motherfucking article god dammit – Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.33.68.185 (talk • contribs)

if you want it there, put it! – Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.18.118.86 (talk • contribs)

This Article is Astounding

Oh my god, I completely agree about the Weird Al thing. I thought I was crazy. This RULES. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.31.77 (talk • contribs)

THIS IS SHIT

Objectively indisputably shit, shite, shi'ite and poo. I vote we delete the whole thing and make it good; at the very least ditch the Star Trek bollocks. Not everyone is a trekkie - I'd go so far as to say most people aren't a trekkie. So they won't think it's funny. They'll think it's fucking stupid. --poorsod^{I crave recognition} 09:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Here, here. Quote spam and lists do not make a funny article, not to mention the dreadful Star Trek references. This needs steamrolled. Any takers? --El Jefé de Pancho 07:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

job

why is colbert's occupation as a korean pop sensation not put on this – Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.201.67 (talk • contribs)