Talk:SAT

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to SAT. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

Wanting to improve

Since the article just got a QFA, I want to improve it to the level of VFA. I already removed/changed what I thought was the weakest section (the second Critical Reading), but I'm wondering what else needs improvement. ShadowMan 20:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Equating Section

I feel this article could benefit from a joke about the equating section on the SAT (the one that doesn't count, but you don't know which one it is), but am unsure of how to incorporate one. FICAhatesyou 21:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

How To

Honestly this is a good article, but it would go better along the lines of a "How To:Pass the SAT" article instead of a general information one. It doesn't provide enough information about the SAT itself but gives the reader information on passing it.--Someguy503 16:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)