Talk:Rake

I have rake material that is "ready" to be submitted, I just need the current edit to be finished.

I added some. Still needs some images. FireSpirit 00:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Heck, I made this. FireSpirit 00:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Mine needs work, but its a start

I added some more. By the way, use four '~' at the end to sign your post. FireSpirit 00:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

okFranksmell 00:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

your future of rakes makes my biorake... redundant, either they need to be merged, or other major revisions must be made to set them apart Franksmell 01:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I think I did it rather nicely. What do you think? I'm gonna make some images now. FireSpirit 01:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

you did, I changed the order, I thought the image needed to come first, and that mine was written first anyway

I'm going to recieve the ICU (we never were full blow NRV), it will make it look half respectable Franksmell 01:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

so thats a rake in that knight's hand... Franksmell 02:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

HAND RAKE = TEH ACE

what did you do to it? I fixed the reference you forgot to finish Franksmell 03:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

too many images, some have to go-none of mine Franksmell 03:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I think the page looks pretty awesome. FireSpirit 04:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

ok-I'm done for today/night --Franksmell 04:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

From Pee Review

This needs still needs some work--Franksmell 01:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	5	It has some potential, but it needs more of an introduction.
Concept:	6	Can't say I've seen this before.
Prose and formatting:	4	Needs more links.
Images:	9	Lots of good pictures.
Miscellaneous:	10	Nothing Miscellaneous.
Final Score:	34	Don't think it's as good as I say it is, I'm one of the generous reviewers. But it has a lot of potential, just work on the introduction and links.
Reviewer:	--Emmzee 14:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)