Talk:Parallel thinking

From the article

I see you've deviated off the main topic and start remenescing about your own dillusions.However, you're spontaneous thought and satirical humour are somewhat amusing yet still provoke thought.The young generation(assuming you are young as well) has to long ignored thought and real education.Education is the quenching of the burning need of knowledge, not sitting in dingy old classrooms, slowly being brainwashed into modern world's mundane routine. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.69.17 (talk • contribs)

Later changed to

Although you have digressed off the main topic, I find your monologues quite amusing(keep the parrallel thinking concept in mind, I am not mocking you) as they provoke thought and inquiry,which are the very basics of life that have been repulsively neglected by many inculding myself.Most of our tender society are too caught up with popularity contests and every day tasks that they are oblivious to life's many predictements.But please do tell me, how did you arrive at 1.56%.(Show me which numbers you divided by) – Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.69.17 (talk • contribs)

Sorry it's taken a while to answer - I was busy remenescing about my dillusions. It's always good to see someone who truly understand parrallel thought and it's impact on society, and who finds my monologues amusing.

As to the crux of your question - there were a significant number of variables inculded in my calculations, but I have abridged them to avoid being mundane. Unfortunately I no longer have the original calculations, which has led me to the predictement that I find myself in, being unable to answer.

In the meantime, though, you can always find me on twitter, facebook, myspace, linked-in, et al., where I'm always appreciative of anything that will add to my popularity. Pup 05:29 15 Nov '11