Talk:Existentialism

This article is not funny in the slightest. My edit here: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Existentialism&oldid=4132101 was not vandalism. I think it made the article a lot better, and the reversion to a previous version was uncalled for.

Discuss.

--RiNSpy 12:35, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

This article should be removed ASAP

Somebody mention Dieter! 69.248.43.27 06:48, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

This artice needs a complete rewrite. It's totally biased and not funny.

This article has some potential, but, yes, has some kind of edge that I can't put my finger on. It has its moments, but is very confused. Whoever wrote it has a cursory understanding of existentialism, which may be part of the reason that it is poorly done.