Talk:Et al
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
From Pee Review[edit source]
I didn't write it, but I enjoyed it. Just wondering what it's chances would be at VFH
Not reviewed yet!
Review now
Review now
I didn't write it, but I enjoyed it. Just wondering what it's chances would be at VFH
| Humour: | 7 | While not laugh out loud hysterical, the extended pun is pretty funny but was a little played out. |
| Concept: | 10 | I love the idea of the common citation "et al" as being a person. |
| Prose and formatting: | 8 | Good prose, but there were a few too many walls of text. |
| Images: | 6 | The first picture is definately the funniest. |
| Miscellaneous: | 7 | not sure what to even put here, generally this article is worth a seven. Good but not great |
| Final Score: | 38 | I almost wish there was more to say but I'm not sure what. It would have been nice to know more about Andres Otherson,(for laughs because a whole page might on the subject might not be doable)and how et al is the more popular among the two. --Leatherboundbooks 22:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC) |
| Reviewer: | ||