Talk:AOL

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to AOL. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

RE:Emptiness[edit source]

Nope, but I had to get back to work that day.. I had hoped somebody else would pick up on it -Ne0n

Emptiness[edit source]

All of the chapters are empty. Is is supposed to be this way? -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 22:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Me too!

- I approve of this anti-AOL article! Huzzah!

Rewrite Huh...[edit source]

Hmmm... how abouut Annoying Old Ladies, or Angry Orange Leprochauns or an articl along one of these lines

i don't know much about AOL culture, but that sounds like a good idea. Multiple AOL pages, with different interpretations and a disambiguation page. There must be enough people around... Soul101

~_MA^REPENT! 09:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Mission Priority[edit source]

This should be on the top of our lists on pages to update! How can Uncyclopedia /not/ have something hilarious about AOL?

Google Search Results[edit source]

I think I was hacked... I recognise those search results. Time to delete mah cookies! --Hypodrive 23:06, 6 May 2007 (UTC)