User:Greenthunder/Should beavers exist?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Optional Header

Should Beavers continue existing?

Some believe beavers are cute, and that their dam-building is useful on occasion. However, others believe that beavers are little buck-toothed beady-eyed demons of deforestation and industrialism who should be wiped from the face of the earth. IMPORTANT NOTE: Justin Bieber is currently a beaver. Destruction of all beavers would cause Bieber to stop existing. This information may affect the argument.

Argument

Yes

Beavers are definitely cute, they have always been important for human culture and development, including for industrious purposes and cultural ones. When it comes to their logging, their dams can potentially save lives and their felling of trees can save the forest for over-population and ecological inbalance! By the way, i do not care about Justin Bieber, but deleting a human (not a beaver) would count as a murder.

All in all, God had and has a plan with beavers, and we need to preserve this.

F.D.C.F.A.R.A.D.W.R.W.I

(Factual debate chronic from a reader and debater with reasonable Wikipedia intelligence)

No

Con side

Argument

Yes

For side

No

Nay side

Verdict

Write the verdict here.

References