Template:Bug report/doc

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A template for dealing with bug reports in the forum. Open reports require only a description; a header is optional.

Usage: open bug reports

{{Bug report
|header= (optional) A short bug-description for quick reference
|description= Bug description and comments go here.
}}

Example:

Open bug.svg Bug report: The logo is missing from my user page!

Description:
  • Lorem ipsum dolorum est. Non eram nescius, Brute, cum, quae summis ingeniis exquisitaque doctrina philosophi Graeco sermone tractavissent, ea Latinis litteris mandaremus, fore ut hic noster labor in varias reprehensiones incurreret. nam quibusdam, et iis quidem non admodum indoctis, totum hoc displicet philosophari. quidam autem non tam id reprehendunt, si remissius agatur, sed tantum studium tamque multam operam ponendam in eo non arbitrantur. erunt etiam, et ii quidem eruditi Graecis litteris, contemnentes Latinas, qui se dicant in Graecis legendis operam malle consumere. postremo aliquos futuros suspicor, qui me ad alias litteras vocent, genus hoc scribendi, etsi sit elegans, personae tamen et dignitatis esse negent. --A. User 11:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Usage: closed bug reports

Only administrators should mark bug reports closed, and only after making sure the bug really has been dealt with. (Duh!) The only parameter required to close an open bug report is closed_by.

{{Bug report
|header= (optional) A short bug-description for quick reference
|description= Bug description and comments go here.
|resolution= (optional) A short comment explaining how it was resolved
|date= (optional) Date the bug was closed. Omit if you use your signature for closed_by.
|closed_by= {{U|User name}} (or ~~~~, if you are closing it yourself)
}}

Example:

Yes check.svg Resolved issue: The logo is missing from my user page!

Description:
  • Lorem ipsum dolorum est. Non eram nescius, Brute, cum, quae summis ingeniis exquisitaque doctrina philosophi Graeco sermone tractavissent, ea Latinis litteris mandaremus, fore ut hic noster labor in varias reprehensiones incurreret. nam quibusdam, et iis quidem non admodum indoctis, totum hoc displicet philosophari. quidam autem non tam id reprehendunt, si remissius agatur, sed tantum studium tamque multam operam ponendam in eo non arbitrantur. erunt etiam, et ii quidem eruditi Graecis litteris, contemnentes Latinas, qui se dicant in Graecis legendis operam malle consumere. postremo aliquos futuros suspicor, qui me ad alias litteras vocent, genus hoc scribendi, etsi sit elegans, personae tamen et dignitatis esse negent. --A. User 11:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
    • Non eram nescius, Brute, cum, quae summis ingeniis exquisitaque doctrina philosophi Graeco sermone tractavissent, ea Latinis litteris mandaremus, fore ut hic noster labor in varias reprehensiones incurreret. nam quibusdam, et iis quidem non admodum indoctis, totum hoc displicet philosophari. quidam autem non tam id reprehendunt, si remissius agatur, sed tantum studium tamque multam operam ponendam in eo non arbitrantur. --Big Mean Sysop (talk) 20:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
      • Erunt etiam, et ii quidem eruditi Graecis litteris. Contemnentes Latinas! --A. User 22:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Resolution: Qui se dicant in Graecis legendis operam malle consumere.
Closed by: Smart T. Pants (talk) 0:00, 29 February 2013 (UTC)