Talk:Evanescence

Obviously this person is angry about the recent firing of another bandmate and the others leaving. Although now the only origional band member is Amy. Yes I am a little upset also. In a way I feel that Amy is using the "Evanescence" name and stomping on it like she is the best ~ although I thought that music and the band that you are with are supposed to be creative and if there are differences to use the best for everyone!!! – Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.77.69.70 (talk • contribs)

(Warning! This comment has been marked as unproductive. Read with sympathy for this poor sad man) What the hell is everybody talking about and why did you replace the rest of the page? And yes, this band still sucks balls (but not as good as I do). My mom says that I am smart for saying this. And you are all bitches. F**k you!!! I am smart and I can spell too. So fuck you all Ev fans, you can't be smarter than me!!! I AM THE ONE!!! I AM THE CHOSEN ONE!!!! Roman Dog Bird 00:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Even though I listen to Evanescence, I still find this funny (at least some parts). Some parts, however, just looked like a childish tantrum and weren't funny at all. The person who did this obviously hates the band and therefore couldn't keep it funny all the time without expressinsg his/her personal views on the band. It would be much more interesting if someone more objective would do this. It is a bit sad to see something that should be a joke just throw garbage on the band's music stile. The parts about Evanescence being an organization and the vampire thing was hilarious, but saying that they are copying Nightwish and Lacuna --something--- is clearly not a joke and besides it doesn't make any sense since those are COMPLETELY different bands. And I must agree that Evanescence fans are very sensitive when it comes to joking about the band, but, ofcourse, not all of them. Strossmayer 00:02, 07 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't get it

I just don't. Isn't the main rule of Uncyclopedia "Be funny and not just stupid"? This article is pretty much.. well, crap. It's insulting and there is absolutely nothing funny in it. It should be either deleted or rewritten (by someone with sense of humor). - Salamon 208.53.183.53 15:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. This article needs a total rewrite. RoxMonk 195.29.99.34 14:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, the christian controversy part was already rewritten. I laughed my ass off on Moody's quote. Leave that part be. I think I might rewrite the rest of the page. Until at least the half of it is rewritten, I say leave Rewrite/hard template. ** Losos - 93.159.71.246 11:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

The whole article needs re-doing, if only so it actually agrees with itself, but I found the Christian Controversy section the worst of the lot. Don't keep that. The only thing I like is the whole LeeBot thing, because that only takes the minutest strech of imagination to believe. I'm bored right now, so I may have a stab at this article. It'll probably be crap though, so feel free to revert if I do bother. 86.146.192.65 14:10, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

Turns out I couldn't think of a bloody thing that would actually be funny. Tougher than it sounds, this. I got rid of that note in the christian section though becuase a) the note shouldn't be in the article, surely? and b) that section's no better than the rest of the article. Oh, the picture should stay though. I like the picture. 86.146.192.65 14:36, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

I agree this article is crap. I do have an idea as to how to rewrite it from scratch, though. I'm going to do it and post the results in a few days, because I think the topic deserves something much better. [FurorTeutonicus] June 29, 2010.

Done. I'm sure it can still be greatly improved, I'm gonna look for some pics to upload myself. Most important is whether you guys like the general idea :) --FurorTeutonicus 23:56, July 2, 2010 (UTC) 03.07.2010