User talk:Insineratehymn/archive9
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:Insineratehymn. |
User:Uncyclopedia Sucks
What's wrong with redirecting it to User:Wikipedia Sucks -- 02:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Because Uncyclopedia Sucks was his original username. Also, you shouldn't be dicking with people's userpages like that. -- 02:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's attacking wikipedia. I don't care about our anti-wikipedia propaganda, but it also was the original username. Do that again, and you get a Ban. Again. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
THANK'D!!
REJOICE!
You have received the
Double-Douser's Award
for exemplary utilization of boiling, scorchingly hot water.
Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?
the most strongly favored article in Uncyclopedia history!
Tried it, huh? (Translation: THANK YOU!!) :) --THINKER 06:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Insineratehymn...
- Hi, Insineratehymn. Just letting you know that UnBooks:Who Killed God? was removed from VFH. However, Thinker has been so kind as to make an entry for it on Pee Review, so, if you have any time, go over and rate it. Thanks! The Humbled Master 16:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
{{Cruft}}
I put it there because those articles are cruft. Or because I went a bit crazy. Or because I simply hate crap and I think it should die a horribly painful death!!!
11:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)- What you just did was spam a template. Now you need to remove your template from all of those articles or else the admins will come down on you like a ton of bricks. -- 11:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
{{VFD}}
I don't know if anyone's bitched, but from a maintenance standpoint, VFD tags should be on articles only when they're actually on VFD. No "reserved slots". I noticed some that you had tagged a month ago only making VFD now. If there's no room on VFD, feel free to keep your own list in your own space, but the template should only go on when those articles are actually on VFD. Thanks. 06/24 14:54 14:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
For reverting the vandalism of a retarded IP on iTrip. Yours truly, Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Topic Name
AHEM!
IS THIS SOME KIND OF FUCKING THANK YOU?!
You head on over to the VFH page, and notice that Is This Some Kind of Fucking Joke?! is no longer there. No it hasn't been stolen you fucking moron! It's simply been moved to the Main Page.
Kindly accept this offering of Jalapeño Cheddar flavored Cheetos as a personal thank you from RAHB for voting for it. Now stop viewing this template and clean the fucking carpet!
Quoi?
Quel est la raison pour ceci? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Umm... nein comprehendo, mon amico. -- 01:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I can see putting it on a talkpage that suffers from drama, but this is pretty much just me talking to myself. I do that sometimes. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Speaking of which, this talkheader is a bit too....wikipedian to my taste...why are we not revising it to match our style? ~ 08:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- We have style? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
For voting for Hoboeroticism, Codeine bestows upon you: One shiny new quarter. Now you can make a homeless guy very happy. |
-- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
VFD - One bit of chairty before bed
I took it upon myself to dig through logs, to see if there was some mention of an IP you reported to the ban patrol. After a bit of digging, I did find one solitary bit of spammage. In the future, it would be wise to consider that comments like "Buttmonkey" in Ban Patrol edits do not help us figure out what someone did.
So, to help you out: Before you hit "submit", instead hit "preview" and check their history. If they have only one edit, it is perhaps not worth reporting them to the Ban Patrol. If they are really worth reporting, please link to that one edit, especially if it's likely to get huffed without a second thought. If someone's made multiple edits to long-standing articles, than the regular user template should be fine, and we can see their badness from there.
Quite often lately I've been running into Ban Patrol entries, and when I check contribs, I see nothing. Generally, this is because the user only made 1 edit. Ever. And it got deleted. If that's the case, don't bother posting them. If their one edit is really bad, then sure, report it. But do us a favor and somehow indicate what they did in your summary. Now that I've got my nice out for the evening, I'm off to bed. If you are still cruising this site, you'll see this and know that you're freed. If not, c'est la vide. Or whatever that saying is. 07/2 03:46
Help!
Benson link spammed you signature.
Thank'ee
Now you can bash your head against a brick wall safely and in style! |
Hope you win UotM! -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 15:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Belated Thanks!
I'm not really good on making banners, so here's a little gift for voting for A Visit with your Psychopathic Grandmother:
User:Mr.Vib has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
User:Mr.Vib has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
Thanks!--Mr.Vib 02:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Not Banned!!
HA! Look's like I survived the Ban Patrol! In yo face! Seriously, we cool? Kip the Dip 07:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit in Philippines
Ok, I understand the purpose of your quoticide, the endless quotes in the beginning of every article is really annoying. But deleting a section of "Famous Quotes" at the bottom of the article? It is a section about quotes and it did kill the humor in the article.
I am going to restore the section that was deleted and clean it up. Please do not delete this section, it is a continuation of the jokes in the article.
--Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!) 09:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
PLS Judging Instructions: Have a Gander
I'm sending you this because you are signed up to judge the Poo Lit Surprise. If there has been some accident or mistake, and you no longer want to judge, please tell me as soon as possible. If you're still good to go, here are the instructions. First, read all the articles in your specified category. Second, judge them. Judge how you like, as long as it's at least somewhat fair and based on merit. And C, post your top 5 articles here, in order: User:ENeGMA/PLS Judging Hit me up on my talk page should these rules not cognizate within you. Thank you again for your continued cooperation in the balletic train wreck that is the Poo Lit Surprise. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Question about your PLS judging....
Are you final with your top 5 decision? Because the article you seem to have chosen for #2 seems to have been renounced by its own author. -- 13:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Best Judge Ever. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)